Course

IgA Nephropathy (Berger’s Disease)

Course Highlights


  • In this IgA Nephropathy (Berger’s Disease)​ course, we will learn about the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) by exploring the multi-hit” model, the role of genetic predisposition, and environmental triggers.
  • You’ll also learn the clinical presentations and diagnostic features of IgAN. 
  • You’ll leave this course with a broader understanding of IgAN from similar conditions. 

About

Contact Hours Awarded: 2

Course By:
R.E. Hengsterman, MSN, RN

Begin Now

Read Course  |  Complete Survey  |  Claim Credit

Read and Learn

The following course content

Introduction   

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), also known as Berger disease, is a major contributor to glomerulonephritis and kidney failure [1][2]. The exact cause of IgAN remains unclear, but may result from an abnormal immune response involving glycosylated 

deposits in the glomerular mesangium that trigger immune-mediated injury to the basement membrane, causing hematuria, proteinuria, and impaired kidney function [1]. First described by Berger and Hinglais in 1968, pathological findings include mesangial proliferation with prominent IgA deposition [2]. The clinical course of the disease has a gradual progression with 20% and 50% of clients developing end-stage renal disease within 20 years of diagnosis [3]. Prevalence varies by ethnicity, race, geography, and genetics, with higher rates among Asian clients than non-Asians and higher in males than females [4]. Early recognition and management are essential to slow disease progression and preserve kidney function. 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. What might be the underlying reasons for the higher prevalence of IgA nephropathy in Asian populations and males compared to other groups, and how could this influence our approach to research and treatment? 
  2. Considering that early recognition and management are crucial in slowing the progression of IgA nephropathy, what challenges might healthcare providers face in achieving early diagnosis, and how can we address these challenges to improve client outcomes? 

Case Study 

A 35-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a two-day history of sore throat, difficulty swallowing, fever, and pink, cloudy urine. The client reported breathlessness with a cough, fatigue, and discomfort in his right ankle over the past 36 hours. He denied pain during urination and had no changes in urinary frequency. 

His medical history was significant for chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 due to IgA nephropathy, for which he was on regular hemodialysis. He also had a seizure disorder and had been managing hypertension for seven years. The client had experienced three previous episodes of glomerulonephritis at ages 16, 22, and 29, each following episodes of pharyngitis. He was a non-smoker, consumed alcohol (about four glasses of wine per week), and had no family history of renal disease. 

 

Physical Examination  

On physical examination, the client appears pale and febrile with a temperature of 38.5°C (101.3°F). Vital signs revealed tachycardia with a heart rate of 144 bpm, accelerated hypertension with a blood pressure of 200/120 mmHg, and an oxygen saturation of 84% on room air, improving to 95% with oxygen administration. Examination of the throat showed inflammation and enlarged tonsils. Respiratory assessment revealed bilateral basal crepitations. There were no rashes, cyanosis, or splinter hemorrhages. 

 

Laboratory Findings 

Laboratory investigations showed severe anemia with a hemoglobin level of 4.9 g/dL, an elevated white blood cell count of 23.7 × 10⁹/L, and a platelet count of 178 × 10⁹/L. Blood chemistry results included sodium at 134 mmol/L, potassium at 3.7 mmol/L, urea at 7.3 mmol/L, and creatinine at 167 µmol/L. Urinalysis indicated more than 100 red blood cells per high-power field and ++ proteinuria. A peripheral smear revealed early macrocytic anemia with relative neutrophilia.  

 

 

 

 

Imaging Studies 

The hospital team conducted imaging studies to further assess his condition. High-resolution CT of the chest showed extensive patchy areas of ground-glass opacities and air-space consolidation in the bilateral lung parenchyma (more pronounced on the left side), suggesting pneumonitis. A 2D echocardiogram indicated tachycardia without definitive regional wall motion abnormalities and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55%. An ultrasound of the kidneys showed normal size and cortical thickness with no hydronephrosis, and the bladder appeared normal. A plain abdominal X-ray revealed no renal tract calcifications. 

 

Consultations 

The team consulted a nephrologist due to the client’s complex renal history and current presentation. They considered post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis and explored other potential diagnoses. The nephrologist recommended measuring fibrinogen levels and prothrombin time and suggested changing the antibiotic regimen to benzylpenicillin. The team admitted the client to the intensive care unit to manage accelerated hypertension and respiratory distress. 

 

Interventions 

The admission team transfused three units of packed red blood cells and initiated dialysis. They corrected the Vitamin B12 deficiency and started intravenous antibiotics, antacids, nebulization, and oxygen therapy. The team provided supportive care throughout the hospital stay and continued dialysis as a life-saving measure. 

The team performed a renal biopsy to clarify the diagnosis. Histological examination showed normal renal medulla and cortex on light microscopy. However, immunohistochemical analysis revealed significant mesangial deposits of immunoglobulin A (IgA) within the glomeruli, confirming the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy. During his hospitalization, the client’s symptoms improved. The medical team controlled his blood pressure, stabilized his respiratory function, and maintained his hemodynamic stability. Upon discharge, the team advised him to manage his chronic conditions by controlling his blood pressure, adhering to his hemodialysis schedule, managing his seizures, and monitoring for any recurrent symptoms. He arranged follow-up appointments with nephrology and primary care to ensure continuity of care. 

 

Case Study Questions: 

  • What might be the connection between the client’s recurrent episodes of glomerulonephritis following pharyngitis and his current presentation? 
  • How could we explain the severe anemia observed in the client in the context of his chronic kidney disease and current symptoms? 
  • Why is the discovery of mesangial IgA deposits in the renal biopsy significant for understanding his renal condition? 
  • In what ways might the client’s respiratory symptoms and imaging findings be related to his underlying renal disease? 

 

Etiology 

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) results from abnormal immune reactions that lead to the deposition of immunoglobulin A (IgA) within the glomeruli, increased podocyte permeability, and interstitial fibrosis [1]. Although infectious diseases often precede IgAN and trigger a dysregulated immune response, IgAN does not result from a specific infectious agent [5]. Instead, various clinical and subclinical triggers, along with genetic factors related to IgA glycosylation, activate the immune system [6]. Potential etiologies of IgAN include both familial and sporadic forms [7]. Familial IgAN accounts for fewer than 10% of cases and involves at least 18 different gene segments, such as C1GALT1 and C1GALT1C1 [8]. Sporadic or idiopathic IgAN represents more than 90% of cases [9].  

Despite the association between macroscopic hematuria and mucosal inflammation, no evidence suggests the involvement of a particular infectious agent or hypersensitivity to food antigens, except in a small group of clients with celiac disease [1]. When IgA1 antibodies have abnormal sugar attachments in a specific area, they tend to form clusters with other antibodies in the blood. These clusters activate certain cells in the kidneys called mesangial cells, leading to the buildup of these immune complexes in the kidney tissue [10]. Various systemic conditions contribute to the accumulation of IgA deposits, driving the pathology of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) [11]. 

Recent reports indicate that the pathways leading to glomerular injury are similar between primary and secondary IgAN [1]. Secondary IgAN may arise from liver, gastrointestinal, autoimmune, dermatological, infectious, and drug-related causes [1]. Differentiating primary from secondary IgAN is crucial, as secondary forms focus on addressing the underlying cause rather than using immunosuppressive agents [12]. 

Mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) plays a key role in understanding the pathology of IgA nephropathy, as mucosal tissues produce IgA [13]. MALT provides defense against environmental toxins and microbes and is located in the gut, noted in Peyer’s patches and lymphoid follicles, as well as in the tonsils—sites implicated in IgAN pathogenesis [13]. 

Gastrointestinal disorders have distinct implications for IgAN [14]. Liver disease is the most common cause of secondary IgAN due to compromised clearance of large IgA complexes [15]. Conditions like cirrhosis are associated with IgAN, with some case reports showing improvement in renal parameters with steroid treatment [15]. Other liver disorders linked to IgAN include hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, and autoimmune hepatitis [16].  

In celiac disease, an enzyme known as transglutaminase 2 activates immune cells called B cells. This activation leads to the production of IgG and IgA antibodies. IgA1 antibodies can accumulate in the kidney’s filtering units (the mesangium), causing IgA to deposit, leading to IgA [17]. For clients with IgAN presenting gastrointestinal symptoms, a trial of a gluten-free diet and further diagnostic workup may be reasonable [17]. 

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, poses a risk factor for IgAN and is associated with mortality in both conditions [18]. A common pathogenesis may involve B-cell immunoglobulin over secretion and CD4+ T-cell dysregulation [1][20]. Abnormal intestinal microbiota, characterized by reduced diversity in genera like Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus, are also associated with IgAN, leading some researchers to propose probiotics as a potential therapeutic measure [19]. 

Autoimmune disorders, including Sjögren syndrome, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Behçet disease all link to the development of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) [1][21]. Dermatological conditions such as psoriasis (the most common skin condition related to IgAN), dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, juvenile dermatomyositis, and leukocytoclastic vasculitis also show associations with IgAN [1][22]. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis, a rare type III allergic reaction causing immune-complex-mediated vasculitis in small dermal blood vessels, can lead to renal involvement with IgA deposits, resulting in secondary IgAN [23]. 

Infectious diseases often precede clinical symptoms of IgAN, such as gross hematuria— following upper respiratory tract infections—a phenomenon known as synpharyngitic hematuria [24]. Associated beneficial (commensal) organisms including Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Prevotella, Fusobacterium, Sphingomonas, and Treponema species contribute to tonsillar inflammation [24]. Viral infections caused by COVID-19, HIV, and hepatitis B are also associated with IgAN [24] [25]. 

Drug-induced IgAN involves correlating renal injury timing with medication administration and excluding other causes [26]. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, such as adalimumab and infliximab are associated with IgAN due to their immunomodulatory effects [27]. Other medications linked to secondary IgAN include interleukin-12 and -23 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin, and thioureylene derivatives used for Graves’ disease [22][28]. 

Additional causes, although uncommon, include primary pulmonary diseases like sarcoidosis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or pulmonary hemorrhage [1][29]. Oncological conditions, including myeloproliferative disorders, gastric cancer, lung tumors, renal cell carcinoma, and various other malignancies, can contribute to IgA deposition, which may result in the development of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) [30].  

 

 

 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How does abnormal glycosylation of IgA1 antibodies lead to their deposition in the glomeruli and contribute to the development of IgA nephropathy? 
  2. If infections often precede IgA nephropathy but no specific infectious agent is responsible, what does this suggest about the role of the immune system in this disease? 
  3. What is the significance of mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) in the production of IgA, and how might this relate to the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy? 
  4. How might systemic conditions like liver disease, celiac disease, or autoimmune disorders contribute to the accumulation of IgA deposits in the kidneys? 

Epidemiology 

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) represents the most frequent cause of glomerulonephritis, but its true prevalence remains unclear due to the often asymptomatic nature of the disease and the need for a renal biopsy to confirm diagnosis, a procedure that not all clients receive [1]. Some individuals opt for conservative management if they exhibit a benign form of the disease, and therefore may not have a biopsy to confirm IgAN [1][31]. In the United States, IgAN accounts for 10% of renal biopsies [1][32]. The prevalence is higher in East Asia, where up to 40% of biopsies reveal IgAN, and in Europe, where it accounts for 20% to 30% of biopsies [1][33].  

A systematic analysis of biopsy-based studies from multiple countries indicates an overall incidence of more than 2.5 cases per 100,000 people [1]. Research suggests that East Asian clients diagnosed with IgAN have a higher likelihood of progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to non-Asian clients [33]. Within the United States, IgA nephropathy is more common in White populations than in Black individuals [1]. The disease often presents in children and young adults, with the highest occurrence during the second and third decades of life [1]. There is a male predominance with a ratio of about 2.5:1 in the United States and Europe, whereas in East Asia, the male-to-female ratio is closer to 1:1 [4]. 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. What factors contribute to the difficulty in determining the true prevalence of IgA nephropathy, and how might the asymptomatic nature of the disease and the necessity of a renal biopsy affect this? 
  2. Why do you think IgA nephropathy shows higher prevalence and a greater likelihood of progression to end-stage renal disease in East Asian populations compared to non-Asian populations, and how might gender ratios differ between these regions? 

Pathophysiology 

A multi-hit model explains the pathogenesis of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), focusing on abnormal immune regulation driven by genetic and environmental factors [11]. These “hits” manifest in the IgA molecules identified in client biopsies and blood circulation and immune complexes made up of galactose-deficient IgA1 that accumulate in the glomeruli and bloodstream of individuals with IgAN [34].  

Research identifies glycosylated IgA1 as a heritable trait, with about 25% of relatives of clients with IgAN showing elevated levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 [35]. Segregation analysis indicates that this trait follows a pattern of inheritance involving a major dominant gene alongside a polygenic component [35]. Environmental factors, such as smoking, hypertension, and obesity, play a role in advancing the disease by contributing to microvascular damage, glomerulomegaly, and maladaptive hyperfiltration injury [36]. Nephritogenic immune complexes initiate glomerular inflammation and mesangial proliferation, while the activation of the renin-angiotensin and complement systems leads to glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, resulting in diminished renal function [1][37]. 

The proposed four-hit model emphasizes abnormal mucosal IgA regulation as the central mechanism. The first hit involves abnormal O-glycosylation of the IgA1 hinge region, resulting in increased levels of galactose-deficient IgA1[34]. In individuals with genetic predispositions, triggers like infections cause B cells to generate abnormal IgA that lacks a galactose molecule in the hinge region. Trivial mucosal infections, chronic exposure to pathogens, and abnormal handling of gut commensals may initiate this dysregulated immune response, allowing the aberrant IgA molecules to self-aggregate due to hypoglycosylation [19][34]. 

The second hit occurs when the abnormal IgA1 triggers the production of anti-glycan antibodies and IgA1 autoantibodies. Elevated galactose-deficient IgA1 alone is insufficient to cause IgAN, as relatives of clients may have elevated levels without developing the disease. The liver clears IgA complexes, which explains the strong association between liver disease and IgAN [34[35]. 

The third hit involves the formation of abnormal IgA1 immune complexes that circulate in the bloodstream and deposit in the mesangium of the kidneys [38]. This leads to the fourth hit: activation of mesangial cells and the lectin and alternative complement pathways. This activation results in the release of cytokines, deposition of extracellular proteins, and systemic inflammation and fibrosis [38]. Cytokine release activates podocytes, increasing glomerular permeability and causing tubular interstitial damage [38]. This process leads to interstitial fibrosis, tubular damage, and infiltration by inflammatory cells including macrophages and dendritic cells [38]. 

Complement activation plays a significant role in IgAN pathogenesis through the mannose-binding lectin pathway [39]. Polymeric IgA1 activates this pathway, and components like complement factor H and properdin appear within glomerular deposits [1]. The alternative complement system activates, with immune complexes containing C3 appearing in approximately 90% of kidney biopsy samples from IgAN clients, as immunofluorescence staining reveals [39]. 

These two complement pathways are pivotal in causing glomerular basement membrane damage, leading to the ultrafiltration of larger molecules, and resulting in hematuria. It is unclear why some individuals develop asymptomatic hematuria while others have a rapid progression of glomerulonephritis and eventual renal failure. 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How does the “multi-hit” model describe the development of IgA nephropathy, and what are the specific roles of genetic and environmental factors in this process? 
  2. Why is the presence of elevated galactose-deficient IgA1 alone insufficient to cause IgA nephropathy, and what additional steps are necessary for the disease to manifest according to the four-hit model? 
  3. How do the activation of mesangial cells and the complement pathways contribute to the progression of IgA nephropathy, and what are the consequences of this activation on kidney function? 
  4. Considering the significant role of complement activation in IgA nephropathy, why might some individuals develop rapid progression to renal failure while others remain asymptomatic, despite similar underlying mechanisms? 

History & Physical  

In clients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the history and physical examination are often unremarkable [1]. The primary complaint revolves around gross hematuria, which can manifest as brown, red, or “cola-colored” urine [1]. Acute renal failure may present ankle edema, facial puffiness, and hypertension [40]. Other symptoms can include frothy urine or the presence of a rash, with hematuria sometimes following recent upper respiratory infections such as pharyngitis or resulting from intense exercise [1][40].  

During the physical examination, it is important to evaluate blood pressure and check for indicators of impaired kidney function, such as swelling (edema), fluid accumulation in the abdomen (ascites), and crackles at the lung bases. Hypertension is a common manifestation in IgAN [1][41]. Since IgAN may coexist with conditions like cirrhosis, liver diseases, and celiac disease, a thorough general and abdominal examination is crucial to exclude these comorbidities [15]. The mode of presentation varies based on age group and histological biopsy patterns, with asymptomatic hematuria and progressive kidney disease being among the most prevalent clinical phenotypes. 

Routine screening may detect asymptomatic hematuria with mild proteinuria at around 0.5 g/day [1]. Some individuals presenting with isolated microscopic hematuria and mild proteinuria may develop substantial proteinuria and hypertension, underscoring the importance of long-term monitoring. Renal survival rates vary depending on factors such as biopsy timing and the presence of lead-time bias, with estimated 10-year renal survival rates between 57% and 91% [42].  

In IgA nephropathy, synpharyngitic macroscopic hematuria serves as the initial symptom, with clients seeking medical care due to the concurrent onset of visible blood in the urine and a throat infection or other illness [24]. Recurrent episodes of visible hematuria are common. Although nephrotic-range proteinuria can develop in IgAN, the co-occurrence of both macroscopic hematuria and significant proteinuria is uncommon [1]. 

Extrarenal manifestations occur due to the systemic nature of the disease. Studies report that up to 35% of clients experience gastrointestinal symptoms, including abdominal pain, cramping, and diarrhea [14]. 

Less than 5% of clients with IgAN present with acute kidney injury resulting from rapid development of crescents or tubular damage or obstruction due to gross hematuria and red blood cell (RBC) casts [1][43]. Research identifies glycosylated IgA1 as a heritable trait, with about 25% of relatives of IgAN clients showing elevated levels of galactose-deficient IgA1 [44]. 

Evaluation of IgAN begins with establishing the diagnosis. Initial investigations include urinalysis to detect microscopic hematuria. The presence of red cells and red cell casts indicates glomerular injury and potential active disease. The assessment of proteinuria uses the protein-to-creatinine ratio in urine or 24-hour urinary protein excretion. Clinicians can measure serum creatinine levels and estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to evaluate renal function. 

A renal biopsy serves as the key method for confirming the diagnosis, enabling detailed analysis of kidney tissue through light microscopy, electron microscopy, and immunofluorescence techniques [1]. Demonstrating the deposition of IgA in the glomerular basement membrane through immunofluorescence is the gold standard for diagnosis [1]. The Oxford classification to classify IgAN and predict prognosis is a classification system that integrates histological, clinical, and biomarker criteria, providing valuable prognostic insights. The Oxford classification considers criteria such as mesangial cellularity, endocapillary proliferation, segmental glomerulosclerosis, and tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis [45].  

Several studies have confirmed that tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis are the strongest predictors of a poor prognosis in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) [1][46]. Fibroblast markers, including FSP1 and URG11, show an inverse relationship with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and disease outcome [1][46].  

Additional markers of IgAN include urinary indicators that reflect complement pathway activity, such as urinary C4d, serum C3 levels, and other serum markers related to the alternative and lectin complement pathways [1][47]. Serum IgA levels alone do not offer sufficient sensitivity or specificity for diagnosing IgAN [48]. However, elevated levels of galactose-deficient IgA occur in both clients with IgAN and in relatives without clinical symptoms of the disease [48]. 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How does the often unremarkable history and physical examination in clients with IgA nephropathy influence the approach to diagnosing this condition, and what strategies can clinicians use to identify it despite subtle initial presentations? 
  2. Why is gross hematuria considered a primary complaint in IgA nephropathy, and how can its association with recent upper respiratory infections or intense exercise aid in differentiating IgAN from other renal disorders? 
  3. In what ways do comorbid conditions such as cirrhosis, liver diseases, and celiac disease complicate the clinical evaluation of IgA nephropathy, and why is a thorough general and abdominal examination essential in these cases? 
  4. How do extrarenal manifestations like gastrointestinal symptoms and the variability in clinical presentations based on age and gender impact the prognosis and long-term management of clients with IgA nephropathy? 

Differential Diagnosis  

Two conditions that mimic the symptoms of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) are IgA vasculitis and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis [1][49]. IgA vasculitis, or Henoch-Schönlein purpura, results from abnormal IgA deposits that target the small blood vessels in multiple organs [49]. Unlike IgAN, which affects individuals aged 15 and older, IgA vasculitis occurs in those aged 15 and younger [49]. Microscopic examination of clients with IgA vasculitis shows more capillary and glomerular injury, while IgAN shows mesangial proliferation. Some treatments overlap due to the autoimmune nature of both conditions [49]. 

Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis can also manifest in the context of an upper respiratory infection (URI) [50]. The key difference is that IgAN presents with or after a URI, whereas poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis arises two to three weeks following a URI [50]. 

Other potential differential diagnoses for IgAN include lupus nephritis, which is associated with multisystemic presentations; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, distinguishable on renal biopsy; thin basement membrane nephropathy, often characterized by microscopic hematuria and a family history of benign microscopic hematuria; Alport syndrome, associated with ocular and otic symptoms; malignancies ranging from the kidneys to the urethra, which should be ruled out in all clients aged 40 or older; and urolithiasis, which manifests with colicky pain not associated with IgAN and can be identified through imaging that demonstrates obstruction [1][51][52]. 

Several significant issues are essential for navigating the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of IgAN. Distinguishing primary IgAN from secondary IgAN is crucial, as managing secondary cases requires addressing the underlying disease. The lectin and alternative complement pathways play a significant role in the pathology of IgA nephropathy [53]. IgA nephropathy condition exhibits a higher prevalence and appears more aggressive among individuals of East Asian origin [1][4][33]. Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria often indicates a favorable prognosis, while progressing disease with crescents observed on biopsy suggests a poorer prognosis [3].  

The Oxford MEST classification system stratifies risk in IgAN clients, though some guidelines consider the presence of crescents while others do not [50]. Gross hematuria in individuals aged 40 or older warrants a comprehensive evaluation to rule out potential underlying kidney or bladder neoplasms [49]. Differentiating IgAN from IgA vasculitis and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis is essential due to variations in treatment approaches for each condition [49]. Sparsentan and nefecon are two recently FDA-approved treatments for IgAN, and ongoing clinical trials aim to assess therapeutic agents targeting various steps of the IgAN pathways [50][54]. 

 

 

 

 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How does the age of a client presenting with IgA-related symptoms influence your differential diagnosis between IgA nephropathy and IgA vasculitis, and what are the key distinguishing features based on age? 
  2. In what ways does the timing of symptom onset following an upper respiratory infection help differentiate IgA nephropathy from poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, and why is this distinction clinically significant? 
  3. Why is it crucial to differentiate IgA nephropathy from other glomerular diseases such as lupus nephritis or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis based on renal biopsy findings, and how do these differences impact treatment strategies? 
  4. Considering the variety of potential differential diagnoses for IgA nephropathy, such as thin basement membrane nephropathy, Alport syndrome, and malignancies, what factors should clinicians prioritize to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management? 

Therapeutic Management  

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) follows a prolonged course that requires collaborative management by an interprofessional healthcare team. Initial detection often occurs through abnormal urinalysis findings during routine screenings by primary care providers, prompting prompt referral to a nephrologist or pediatric nephrologist for comprehensive evaluation. Coexisting autoimmune diseases may necessitate input from rheumatologists, while systemic manifestations might involve endocrinologists, gastroenterologists, or other specialists. Pharmacists play a critical role in educating clients about steroid therapy, ensuring compliance, and maintaining open communication with the clinical team.  

Laboratory personnel must guarantee precise sample collection to avoid false-positive results for proteinuria. Dietitians design tailored diets low in salt, protein, and fat to support nutritional needs. Nurses provide comprehensive client assessment, counseling, and coordination among various specialties. All team members must maintain accurate client records and communicate any concerns to ensure optimal care. 

Careful regulation of fluid intake is necessary, considering the client’s fluid balance and kidney function. If providers anticipate progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), they should educate clients about renal replacement therapy options. Social workers offer crucial support and guidance to clients and their families during this challenging phase. The complexity of IgAN requires clinicians, pharmacists, nurses, and allied health professionals to collaborate in educating and supporting both the client and their family to achieve optimal outcomes. 

The management of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) starts by confirming the diagnosis through a renal biopsy, while also excluding potential secondary causes. Key considerations for formulating a management plan include assessing proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and histological findings. The primary goals of treatment are to induce remission and prevent complications. First-line agents for managing proteinuria and lowering blood pressure involve angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), aiming for a target blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg [54]. If proteinuria exceeds 1 g/day, the systolic blood pressure target is less than 125 mm Hg. Corticosteroids are essential in reducing proteinuria when levels exceed 1 g/day.  

Conservative therapy plays a crucial role by reducing proteinuria and slowing renal function decline. The Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy of Progressive IgA Nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) study found that about one-third of clients achieved satisfactory outcomes without immunosuppressive therapy following a six-month trial of optimized conservative measures, including aggressive ACE inhibitor or ARB titration [56]. The study found no notable difference in primary outcomes, including death, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or a greater than 40% reduction in GFR, between clients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and those undergoing optimal medical management alone during both three-year and ten-year follow-ups [56]. 

Clinicians can prescribe a tapering course of prednisone for two to four months. The TESTING trial showed that methylprednisolone treatment for six to nine months slowed disease progression compared to placebo in clients with proteinuria exceeding 1 g/day [56][57]. However, due to an excess of infections and adverse events, clinicians reduced the initial dose and added prophylaxis for opportunistic infections. Longer-term data suggest limited sustainability of effects.  

Several novel medications offer promise for improving outcomes in IgAN. Sparsentan, a non-immunosuppressive dual endothelin and angiotensin receptor antagonist, received accelerated FDA approval in February 2023 [50][54]. The PROTECT trial showed that sparsentan reduced proteinuria and tended to preserve GFR compared to irbesartan [58]. Budesonide, in the form of oral nefecon, targets the terminal ileum near Peyer’s patches, reducing systemic effects due to extensive first-pass metabolism [59]. The NEFIGAN and NefIgArd trials demonstrated significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of GFR with nefecon use [60]. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have also shown efficacy in slowing chronic kidney disease progression, with further studies needed to evaluate their effects specifically in IgAN clients [61]. 

Other immunosuppressive agents like mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have shown variable results, with some promising outcomes in Asian populations [62]. The MAIN trial in China indicated significant reductions in proteinuria and preservation of GFR with MMF, highlighting potential regional differences in disease progression [50][63]. Rituximab has not demonstrated significant benefits in IgAN, and other medications such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, and leflunomide lack unambiguous evidence of substantial benefit [64]. 

Consider combination therapy with corticosteroids and another agent for progressive IgAN. Some trials have shown improved renal survival with combination therapy, while others found no significant difference compared to corticosteroids alone. Researchers have studied tonsillectomy in Asian populations, for its potential to induce remission or slow progression. However, randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated the efficacy, leading many regions to exclude it from standard care guidelines.  

For clients progressing to ESRD, renal transplantation is a viable option, although there is a risk of IgAN recurrence in the transplanted kidney [50][65]. Recurrence rates are around 23% at 15 years, correlating with an increased risk of graft rejection [65]. Despite recurrence, progression to ESRD in the grafted kidney is rare [65]. Immunosuppression with corticosteroids and treatment with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may help delay progression of recurrent disease in allografts [50]. 

Recent advancements have led to the development of potential therapeutic agents targeting different steps of IgAN pathogenesis. Endothelin receptor antagonists like sparsentan modulate hemodynamics [49]. B-cell inhibitors targeting factors like BAFF and APRIL are under investigation, focusing on B-cell modulation and IgA production [66]. Researchers are exploring complement activation inhibitors, such as eculizumab, due to the complement system’s role in IgAN deposits. Other investigational agents include bortezomib, fostamatinib, and small-interfering RNAs, all contributing to a growing pipeline of novel therapies aimed at improving outcomes for clients with IgAN [67]. 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How does the collaborative approach of an interprofessional healthcare team enhance the management of IgA nephropathy, and what roles do different team members play in ensuring comprehensive client care? 
  2. Why are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) considered first-line treatments for managing proteinuria and hypertension in IgA nephropathy, and how do their mechanisms contribute to slowing disease progression? 
  3. What are the potential benefits and risks associated with the use of corticosteroids and novel medications like sparsentan and nefecon in the treatment of IgA nephropathy, and how should clinicians determine the most appropriate therapy for individual clients? 
  4. In what ways do recent advancements and investigational therapies targeting different pathways of IgA nephropathy pathogenesis, such as complement activation inhibitors and B-cell modulators, offer promise for improving client outcomes, and what challenges remain in integrating these treatments into standard practice? 

Prognosis and Complications 

Up to 50% of clients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) experience a benign disease course [50]. Prognosis can be predictable when using the Oxford classification outlined in the pathology section. The MEST criteria—which include Mesangial hypercellularity (M), Endocapillary hypercellularity (E), Segmental glomerulosclerosis (S), and Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T)—and the presence of crescents serve as poor prognostic indicators [50]. Microscopic hematuria combined with mild proteinuria points to a positive prognosis, reflecting a benign and symptom-free progression of the disease [1][24].  

Three risk factors are associated with the need for dialysis or risk of death: proteinuria of 1 gram per day or more, sustained hypertension, and a high Oxford classification MEST-C score (some algorithms also include a category for crescents) [68]. Clients with sustained proteinuria of 1 gram per day or higher have a 46-fold increased risk of progressing to ESRD compared to those with proteinuria less than 500 mg per day [69].  

Although only a small percentage of clients diagnosed with IgAN progress to ESRD, its high prevalence makes it a frequent cause of ESRD [33]. As the disease advances, complications of renal failure may arise, including hypertension, edema, anemia, heart failure, and pulmonary edema. Common adverse effects and complications of both steroid and steroid-sparing therapies include an increased risk of infections, hypertension, fluid retention, weight gain, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and iatrogenic Cushing syndrome [70]. Complications of steroid-sparing agents may include immunosuppression, anaphylaxis, renal injury, and hepatotoxicity [70]. 

 

 

 

 

Quiz Questions

Self Quiz

Ask yourself...

  1. How do the MEST criteria and the presence of crescents within the Oxford classification system enhance our ability to predict the prognosis of IgA nephropathy, and in what ways might these prognostic indicators influence clinical decision-making and treatment strategies? 
  2. Considering that sustained proteinuria of 1 gram per day or more significantly increases the risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease, what approaches can healthcare providers take to monitor and manage proteinuria in clients with IgA nephropathy to improve their long-term outcomes and reduce the likelihood of severe complications? 
  3. How does the “multi-hit” model of IgA nephropathy integrate genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and abnormal immune responses, and what are the implications of this model for developing targeted therapeutic strategies?
  4. In what ways does a multidisciplinary approach enhance the management of IgA nephropathy, and how do individual risk factors and disease severity influence the selection of treatment modalities to achieve optimal client outcomes?
  5. How does the abnormal immune response in IgA nephropathy lead to kidney damage, and what are the potential mechanisms behind hematuria and proteinuria in affected clients?
  6. Given that the exact cause of IgA nephropathy remains unclear, what are the current theories, and how might future research further elucidate the underlying causes of this disease?
  7. How has IgA nephropathy evolved since its first description by Berger and Hinglais in 1968, and what are the advancements in its diagnosis and treatment?
  8. What are the implications of the gradual progression of IgA nephropathy for client monitoring and long-term management strategies?
  9. How do variations in ethnicity, race, geography, and genetics influence the prevalence of IgA nephropathy, and what does this suggest about potential genetic or environmental risk factors?
  10. In what ways can early recognition and management of IgA nephropathy contribute to better client outcomes, and what specific strategies are most effective in achieving this?
  11. Considering the high percentage of clients progressing to end-stage renal disease within two decades, what are the key indicators that healthcare providers should monitor to predict and prevent severe disease progression?
  12. What role do gender differences play in the prevalence and progression of IgA nephropathy, and how should this influence clinical practice and client education?
  13. How does mesangial proliferation with prominent IgA deposition contribute to the overall pathology of IgA nephropathy, and why is it significant in differentiating IgAN from other kidney diseases?

Conclusion

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a multifaceted glomerular disease marked by the deposition of IgA in the renal mesangium, leading to a spectrum of clinical manifestations from benign hematuria to progressive renal failure [1]. The pathogenesis involves a “multi-hit” model where genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and abnormal immune responses culminate in the formation of nephritogenic IgA complexes [11]. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis, often confirmed through renal biopsy and classified using the Oxford MEST-C system, are crucial for guiding effective management strategies [50]. The disease’s prevalence varies with a higher incidence and more aggressive progression observed in East Asian populations [1][4]. 

Learners will recognize that managing IgAN necessitates a multidisciplinary approach tailored to the individual’s risk factors and disease severity. Treatment focuses on reducing proteinuria and controlling hypertension using ACE inhibitors or ARBs, with corticosteroids and novel agents like sparsentan and nefecon employed in more severe cases [50] [54] [58]. The prognosis depends on factors such as proteinuria levels, blood pressure control, and histological findings, with up to half of the clients achieving remission. Ongoing research into the pathophysiological mechanisms of IgAN is paving the way for targeted therapies, emphasizing the importance of interprofessional collaboration in improving client outcomes and advancing our understanding of this complex disease. 

References + Disclaimer

  1. Rout, P., Limaiem, F., & Hashmi, M. F. (2024, April 22). IGA Nephropathy (Berger Disease). StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538214/ 
  2. IGA Nephropathy (Berger Disease). (2024, January 1). PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30855802/
  3. Habas, E., Ali, E., Farfar, K., Errayes, M., Alfitori, J., Habas, E., Ghazouani, H., Akbar, R., Khan, F., Dab, A. A., & Elzouki, A. (2022). IgA nephropathy pathogenesis and therapy: Review & updates. Medicine, 101(48), e31219. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000031219
  4. Kiryluk, K., Freedberg, D. E., Radhakrishnan, J., Segall, L., Jacobson, J. S., Mathur, M., Mohan, S., & Neugut, A. I. (2023). Global Incidence of IGA Nephropathy by Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic review. Kidney360, 4(8), 1112–1122. https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000000000165
  5. Chang, S., & Li, X. (2020). The role of immune modulation in pathogenesis of IGA nephropathy. Frontiers in Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00092
  6. Xu, L., Zhou, X., & Zhang, H. (2023). An update on the genetics of IGA nephropathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010123
  7. Sato, Y., Tsukaguchi, H., Higasa, K., Kawata, N., Inui, K., Linh, T. N. T., Quynh, T. T. H., Yoshihiko, I., Koiwa, F., & Yoshimura, A. (2021). Positive renal familial history in IgA nephropathy is associated with worse renal outcomes: a single-center longitudinal study. BMC Nephrology, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02425-8
  8. Erger, F., Aryal, R. P., Reusch, B., Matsumoto, Y., Meyer, R., Zeng, J., Knopp, C., Noel, M., Muerner, L., Wenzel, A., Kohl, S., Tschernoster, N., Rappl, G., Rouvet, I., Schröder-Braunstein, J., Seibert, F. S., Thiele, H., Häusler, M. G., Weber, L. T., . . . Beck, B. B. (2023). Germline C1GALT1C1 mutation causes a multisystem chaperonopathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(22). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2211087120
  9. Rajasekaran, A., Julian, B. A., & Rizk, D. V. (2020). IGA nephropathy: an interesting autoimmune kidney disease. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 361(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2020.10.003
  10. Novak, J., Barratt, J., Julian, B. A., & Renfrow, M. B. (2018). Aberrant glycosylation of the IGA1 molecule in IGA nephropathy. Seminars in Nephrology, 38(5), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.016
  11. Knoppova, B., Reily, C., King, R. G., Julian, B. A., Novak, J., & Green, T. J. (2021). Pathogenesis of IGA Nephropathy: Current understanding and implications for Development of Disease-Specific Treatment. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(19), 4501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194501
  12. Pattrapornpisut, P., Avila-Casado, C., & Reich, H. N. (2021). IGA Nephropathy: Core Curriculum 2021. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 78(3), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.01.024
  13. Gesualdo, L., Di Leo, V., & Coppo, R. (2021). The mucosal immune system and IgA nephropathy. Seminars in Immunopathology, 43(5), 657–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-021-00871-y
  14. Pohjonen, J. T., Kaukinen, K. M., Metso, M. J., Nurmi, R. K., Huhtala, H. S., Pörsti, I. H., Mustonen, J. T., & Mäkelä, S. M. (2022). Presence of gastrointestinal symptoms in IgA nephropathy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-022-03019-8
  15. Saha, M. K., Julian, B. A., Novak, J., & Rizk, D. V. (2018). Secondary IgA nephropathy. Kidney International, 94(4), 674–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.030
  16. Jeon, Y. H., Kim, D. W., Lee, S. J., Park, Y. J., Kim, H. J., Han, M., Kim, I. Y., Lee, D. W., Song, S. H., Lee, S. B., & Seong, E. Y. (2020). Autoimmune hepatitis in a patient with immunoglobulin A nephropathy: A case report. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 8(17), 3828–3834. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3828
  17. Luvizotto, M. J., Menezes-Silva, L., Woronik, V., Monteiro, R. C., & Câmara, N. O. S. (2022). Gut-kidney axis in IgA nephropathy: Role on mesangial cell metabolism and inflammation. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.993716
  18. Rehnberg, J., Symreng, A., Ludvigsson, J. F., & Emilsson, L. (2020). Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is More Common in Patients with IgA Nephropathy and Predicts Progression of ESKD: A Swedish Population-Based Cohort Study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 32(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2020060848
  19. Wang, Y., Tian, L., Sun, L., Zhou, W., Zhi, W., Qing, J., Saed, Y. A., Dong, L., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Gut microbes in immunoglobulin A nephropathy and their potential therapeutic applications. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.823267
  20. Yeo, S. C., & Barratt, J. (2023). The contribution of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and other TNF superfamily members in pathogenesis and progression of IgA nephropathy. Clinical Kidney Journal, 16(Supplement_2), ii9–ii18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad200
  21. nephropathy. Clinical Kidney Journal, 16(Supplement_2), ii9–ii18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad200 
  22. Zhang, T., Yang, F., Zuo, K., Wang, J., Cheng, Z., & Zhang, J. (2020). HLA-B27 negativity is associated with renal function decline in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and secondary IGA nephropathy. Frontiers in Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00089
  23. Tota, M., Baron, V., Musial, K., Derrough, B., Konieczny, A., Krajewska, M., Turkmen, K., & Kusztal, M. (2023). Secondary IGA nephropathy and IGA-Associated Nephropathy: A Systematic Review of case reports. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(7), 2726. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072726
  24. Baigrie, D., Goyal, A., & Crane, J. S. (2023, August 8). Leukocytoclastic vasculitis. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482159/
  25. Ueda, H., Okabe, M., Shimizu, A., Yokote, S., Nakashima, A., Tsuboi, N., Ikeda, M., Miyazaki, Y., & Yokoo, T. (2023). Gross hematuria following SARS-COV-2 infection in IGA nephropathy: A report of 5 cases. Kidney Medicine, 5(6), 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100627
  26. Klomjit, N., Zand, L., Cornell, L. D., & Alexander, M. P. (2023). COVID-19 and glomerular diseases. Kidney International Reports, 8(6), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.03.016
  27. Cui, Y., Yang, Y., Lei, W., Lang, X., & Chen, J. (2021). The clinicopathological features of drug-induced acute kidney injury—a single-center retrospective analysis. Annals of Translational Medicine, 9(5), 400. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3826
  28. Strobel, T., Ahmed, W., De La Sancha, C., Bohm, M., & Fischer, M. (2020). IGA nephropathy in the setting of Anti-TNF-Α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. ACG Case Reports Journal, 7(9), e00462. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.0000000000000462
  29. Dougherty, S. C., Desai, N., Cathro, H. P., & Renaghan, A. (2021). IGA nephropathy secondary to ipilimumab use. Case Reports in Nephrology and Dialysis, 11(3), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519169
  30. Pulmonary fibrosis – Symptoms and causes – Mayo Clinic. (2024, February 15). Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/pulmonary-fibrosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20353690
  31. Morel, A., Meuleman, M., Moktefi, A., & Audard, V. (2021). Renal Diseases Associated with Hematologic Malignancies and Thymoma in the Absence of Renal Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposits. Diagnostics, 11(4), 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040710
  32. Ramakrishnan, M., & Leslie, S. W. (2024, August 31). Thin basement membrane nephropathy. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK594234/
  33. Stanley, J. C., & Deng, H. (2020). Progress in pathogenesis of immunoglobin A nephropathy. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8789
  34. Lee, M., Suzuki, H., Nihei, Y., Matsuzaki, K., & Suzuki, Y. (2023). Ethnicity and IgA nephropathy: worldwide differences in epidemiology, timing of diagnosis, clinical manifestations, management and prognosis. Clinical Kidney Journal, 16(Supplement_2), ii1–ii8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad199
  35. Chang, S., & Li, X. (2020). The role of immune modulation in pathogenesis of IGA nephropathy. Frontiers in Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00092
  36. Zeng, Q., Wang, W., Li, Y., Liang, Y., Wang, X., Yan, L., & Yu, R. (2023). Diagnostic and prognostic value of galactose-deficient IgA1 in patients with IgA nephropathy: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis. Frontiers in Immunology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1209394
  37. Hall, J., Juncos, L., Wang, Z., Hall, M., Carmo, J. D., & Da Silva, A. (2014). Obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, 75. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijnrd.s39739
  38. Kazi, A. M., & Hashmi, M. F. (2023, June 26). Glomerulonephritis. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560644/
  39. Ebefors, K., Bergwall, L., & Nyström, J. (2022). The Glomerulus according to the Mesangium. Frontiers in Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.740527
  40. Medjeral-Thomas, N. R., Cook, H. T., & Pickering, M. C. (2021). Complement activation in IgA nephropathy. Seminars in Immunopathology, 43(5), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-021-00882-9
  41. Nephrotic syndrome in adults. (2023, October 16). National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/kidney-disease/nephrotic-syndrome-adults
  42. IgA nephropathy (Berger disease) – Symptoms and causes – Mayo Clinic. (2023, June 9). Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/iga-nephropathy/symptoms-causes/syc-20352268
  43. Li, Y., Tang, Y., Lin, T., & Song, T. (2023). Risk factors and outcomes of IgA nephropathy recurrence after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Immunology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1277017
  44. Sevillano, A. M., Caravaca-Fontán, F., Garcia-Galan, L. C., Fernandez-Juarez, G., Lopez-Revuelta, K., Guzmán, D. A., Martín-Reyes, G., Quintana, L. F., Rodas, L. M., De La Nieta, M. D. S., Rabasco, C., Espinosa, M., Diaz-Encarnación, M., Miguel, L. S., Barrios, C., Rodriguez, E., Garcia, P., Valera, A., Peña, J., . . . Praga, M. (2023). Effect of immunosuppressive treatments on kidney outcomes after gross Hematuria-Related Acute kidney injury in older patients with IGA nephropathy. Kidney International Reports, 8(8), 1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.05.027
  45. Gharavi, A. G., Moldoveanu, Z., Wyatt, R. J., Barker, C. V., Woodford, S. Y., Lifton, R. P., Mestecky, J., Novak, J., & Julian, B. A. (2008). Aberrant IGA1 glycosylation is inherited in familial and sporadic IGA nephropathy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 19(5), 1008–1014. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2007091052
  46. Howie, A. J., & Lalayiannis, A. D. (2023). Systematic Review of the Oxford Classification of IGA Nephropathy: Reproducibility and Prognostic Value. Kidney360, 4(8), 1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.34067/kid.0000000000000195
  47. Haaskjold, Y. L., Lura, N. G., Bjørneklett, R., Bostad, L. S., Knoop, T., & Bostad, L. (2023). Long-term follow-up of IgA nephropathy: clinicopathological features and predictors of outcomes. Clinical Kidney Journal, 16(12), 2514–2522. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad154
  48. Marro, J., Chetwynd, A. J., Hawkes, J., Northey, S. J., & Oni, L. (2023). Urinary markers of the alternative and lectin complement pathway are increased in IgA vasculitis nephritis. Clinical Kidney Journal, 16(12), 2703–2711. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad236
  49. Zhao, N., Hou, P., Lv, J., Moldoveanu, Z., Li, Y., Kiryluk, K., Gharavi, A. G., Novak, J., & Zhang, H. (2012). The level of galactose-deficient IgA1 in the sera of patients with IgA nephropathy is associated with disease progression. Kidney International, 82(7), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2012.197
  50. Pillebout, E. (2021). IGA vasculitis and IGA nephropathy: same disease? Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(11), 2310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112310
  51. Rawla, P., Padala, S. A., & Ludhwani, D. (2022, October 9). Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538255/
  52. Varade, W. S. (2016). Nephritis (Chapter 294). American Academy of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.9954/GBChapter294
  53. Zhou, X. J. (2017, March 1). Glomerular Diseases Associated Primarily with Asymptomatic or Gross Hematuria. Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/silvas-diagnostic-renal-pathology/glomerular-diseases-associated-primarily-with-asymptomatic-or-gross-hematuria/35C4445BEC6FCA2D04BED556D7453A17
  54. Medjeral-Thomas, N. R., & O’Shaughnessy, M. M. (2020). Complement in IGA Nephropathy: The role of complement in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and future management of IGA nephropathy. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease, 27(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2019.12.004
  55. Lim, R. S., Yeo, S. C., Barratt, J., & Rizk, D. V. (2024). An update on current therapeutic options in IGA nephropathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(4), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13040947
  56. Pugh, D., Gallacher, P. J., & Dhaun, N. (2019). Management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease. Drugs, 79(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-019-1064-1
  57. Natale, P., Palmer, S. C., Ruospo, M., Saglimbene, V. M., Craig, J. C., Vecchio, M., Samuels, J. A., Molony, D. A., Schena, F. P., & Strippoli, G. F. (2020). Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy. Cochrane Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003965.pub3
  58. Chellappan, A., Kermond, R., Caza, T., Teakell, J., & Hiremath, S. (2022). Steroids for IgA Nephropathy: A #NephJC Editorial on the TESTING trial. Kidney Medicine, 4(12), 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100565
  59. Rovin, B. H., Barratt, J., Heerspink, H. J. L., Alpers, C. E., Bieler, S., Chae, D., Diva, U. A., Floege, J., Gesualdo, L., Inrig, J. K., Kohan, D. E., Komers, R., Kooienga, L. A., Lafayette, R., Maes, B., Małecki, R., Mercer, A., Noronha, I. L., Oh, S. W., . . . Zizzi, C. F. (2023). Efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy (PROTECT): 2-year results from a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet, 402(10417), 2077–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02302-4
  60. Liao, J., Zhou, Y., Xu, X., Huang, K., Chen, P., Wu, Y., Jin, B., Hu, Q., Chen, G., & Zhao, S. (2023). Current knowledge of targeted-release budesonide in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Immunology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.926517
  61. Barratt, J., Lafayette, R., Kristensen, J., Stone, A., Cattran, D., Floege, J., Tesar, V., Trimarchi, H., Zhang, H., Eren, N., Paliege, A., Rovin, B. H., Fragale, G., Karl, A., Losisolo, P., Trimarchi, H., Hoyos, I. G., Lampo, M. G., Monkowski, M., . . . Lau, W. L. (2023). Results from part A of the multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled NefIgArd trial, which evaluated targeted-release formulation of budesonide for the treatment of primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Kidney International, 103(2), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2022.09.017
  62. Krishnan, A., Shankar, M., Lerma, E. V., & Wiegley, N. (2023). Sodium glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and CKD: Are you a #Flozinator? Kidney Medicine, 5(4), 100608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100608
  63. Zhang, H., Zhou, M., Han, X., Yang, Y., & Yu, X. (2020). Mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of Chinese patients with lupus nephritis. Medicine, 99(33), e21121. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000021121
  64. Maixnerova, D., & Tesar, V. (2020). Emerging modes of treatment of IGA nephropathy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(23), 9064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239064
  65. Lafayette, R. A., Canetta, P. A., Rovin, B. H., Appel, G. B., Novak, J., Nath, K. A., Sethi, S., Tumlin, J. A., Mehta, K., Hogan, M., Erickson, S., Julian, B. A., Leung, N., Enders, F. T., Brown, R., Knoppova, B., Hall, S., & Fervenza, F. C. (2016). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Rituximab in IgA Nephropathy with Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 28(4), 1306–1313. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2016060640
  66. Schmidt, J., Liefeldt, L., Baysal, E., Töpfer, S., Dagnæs-Hansen, J., Lerchbaumer, M., Schlomm, T., Ralla, B., Friedersdorff, F., & Peters, R. (2024). IgA nephropathy recurrence after living donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective analysis of postoperative outcomes at a single high-volume transplant center. Renal Replacement Therapy, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-024-00558-8
  67. Vincent, F. B., Saulep-Easton, D., Figgett, W. A., Fairfax, K. A., & Mackay, F. (2013). The BAFF/APRIL system: Emerging functions beyond B cell biology and autoimmunity. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 24(3), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2013.04.003
  68. Tesař, V., Radhakrishnan, J., Charu, V., & Barratt, J. (2023). Challenges in IGA Nephropathy Management: An Era of Complement Inhibition. Kidney International Reports, 8(9), 1730–1740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2023.06.010
  69. Gowrishankar, S., Gupta, Y., Vankalakunti, M., Gowda, K. K., Kurien, A. A., Prema, K. J., Seethalekshmy, N., & Yesodharan, J. (2019). Correlation of Oxford MEST-C scores with clinical variables for IGA nephropathy in South India. Kidney International Reports, 4(10), 1485–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2019.06.013
  70. Sumida, K., Hoshino, J., Ueno, T., Mise, K., Hayami, N., Suwabe, T., Kawada, M., Imafuku, A., Hiramatsu, R., Hasegawa, E., Yamanouchi, M., Sawa, N., Fujii, T., Ohashi, K., Takaichi, K., & Ubara, Y. (2016). Effect of Proteinuria and Glomerular Filtration Rate on Renal Outcome in Patients with Biopsy-Proven Benign Nephrosclerosis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147690. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147690
  71. Yasir, M., Goyal, A., & Sonthalia, S. (2023, July 3). Corticosteroid adverse effects. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531462/
Disclaimer:

Use of Course Content. The courses provided by NCC are based on industry knowledge and input from professional nurses, experts, practitioners, and other individuals and institutions. The information presented in this course is intended solely for the use of healthcare professionals taking this course, for credit, from NCC. The information is designed to assist healthcare professionals, including nurses, in addressing issues associated with healthcare. The information provided in this course is general in nature and is not designed to address any specific situation. This publication in no way absolves facilities of their responsibility for the appropriate orientation of healthcare professionals. Hospitals or other organizations using this publication as a part of their own orientation processes should review the contents of this publication to ensure accuracy and compliance before using this publication. Knowledge, procedures or insight gained from the Student in the course of taking classes provided by NCC may be used at the Student’s discretion during their course of work or otherwise in a professional capacity. The Student understands and agrees that NCC shall not be held liable for any acts, errors, advice or omissions provided by the Student based on knowledge or advice acquired by NCC. The Student is solely responsible for his/her own actions, even if information and/or education was acquired from a NCC course pertaining to that action or actions. By clicking “complete” you are agreeing to these terms of use.

 

Complete Survey

Give us your thoughts and feedback

Click Complete

To receive your certificate

Want to earn credit for this course? Sign up (new users) or Log in (existing users) to complete this course for credit and receive your certificate instantly.