Course
Impact of Recurrent C.Diff Infections
Course Highlights
- In this Impact of Recurrent C.Diff Infections course, we will learn about the epidemiology and pathophysiology of Clostridioides difficile infections.
- You’ll also learn the clinical manifestations and risk factors for Clostridioides difficile infections.
- You’ll leave this course with a broader understanding of treatment strategies for Clostridioides difficile infections.
About
Contact Hours Awarded: 1
Course By:
R.E. Hengsterman, MSN, RN
Begin Now
Read Course | Complete Survey | Claim Credit
➀ Read and Learn
The following course content
Introduction
In 1935, Hall and O’Toole isolated Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) from the stool of a healthy infant [1]. The identified organism became a leading cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated illness in Europe and North America causing a range of symptoms from mild diarrhea to severe life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon [1] [21].
Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile), once referred to as Clostridium difficile, is a rod-shaped Gram-positive, toxin-producing anaerobe that can exist in two forms: a vegetative state and a spore state [5]. C. diff produces two exotoxins: toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB) [6]. These toxins interfere with the cytoskeletal structure and the tight junctions of target cells, leading to cell rounding and cell death [10]. The spore form (dormant) of C. difficile is robust, enabling the bacterium to survive under extreme conditions and resist standard sterilization techniques [1].
The spores are impervious to heat, acid, ultraviolet radiation, aggressive chemicals, and antibiotics [1]. The antibiotic-resistant nature of the spores allows them to remain in the gastrointestinal tract, which can result in recurring infections even after the elimination of the vegetative form of C. difficile [7]. Despite ongoing efforts to enhance prevention and control its spread in healthcare facilities, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) continues to be a predominant source of hospital-acquired antibiotic-associated diarrhea in the United States and other developed countries [2].
Clostridioides difficile is notable in healthcare settings due to its association with antibiotic use, its capability to cause recurrent infections and the organism’s ability to survive on non-living surfaces (fomites) for extended periods [1][9]. The hospital setting is a significant mediator in the spread of healthcare-associated infections [9]. Recent surges in C. difficile infections have resulted in heightened morbidity and mortality rates secondary to the emergence of a new hypervirulent strain, identified as BI/NAP1/027 (Strain 027) [4]. This strain produces enhanced toxin production compared to historical strains of C. difficile [4].
Research calculates the economic burden of C. difficile in the United States to be approximately $5.4 billion, with around $4.7 billion of this cost arising within healthcare facilities secondary to hospitalizations and recurring infections [8]. In patients experiencing a primary C. difficile infection, the average healthcare cost is $43,718, in contrast to $19,513 for patients without C. difficile. Breaking down the costs by care settings, the inpatient expenses for those with C. difficile infection averaged $28,014, compared to $6,918 for those without the infection [8].
In cases of recurrent C. difficile infection, the average healthcare expense is $49,456, while it was $38,876 for matched patients without the infection [8]. Research indicates that the total healthcare cost associated with recurrent C. difficile infection, as opposed to a primary infection is $10,500 [8].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Considering the ability of C. difficile spores to resist extreme environmental conditions and standard sterilization techniques, what implications does this have for infection control and prevention strategies in healthcare settings?
- Given the significant financial burden associated with C. difficile infections and recurrent infections, how can healthcare systems balance the need for effective treatment with the imperative to manage costs?
- With the emergence of more virulent strains of C. difficile, such as the BI/NAP1/027 strain, how should clinical approaches to diagnosing and treating c. diff infection evolve?
Case Study: Complicated Clinical Manifestations of C. difficile Infection
Patient Profile
- Age/Gender: 65-year-old male
- Medical History: Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes
- Hospitalization History: Recent hospitalization for hip replacement surgery, received broad-spectrum antibiotics for post-op infection management.
Clinical Presentation
- Asymptomatic Period: Patient was an asymptomatic carrier post-discharge.
- Onset of Symptoms: 10 days post-discharge, the patient reported: watery diarrhea with occasional mucus Mild abdominal pain Low-grade fever Anorexia and nausea.
- Week 2: Symptoms worsened with increased diarrhea frequency, and the presence of occult blood.
- Week 3: Development of severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and significant dehydration.
Diagnostic Workup
- Stool Tests: Positive for C. difficile toxins.
- Blood Tests: Elevated white blood cell count, signs of dehydration.
- Imaging: Abdominal CT indicated colonic wall thickening.
Differential Diagnosis
- Consider infectious colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and ischemic colitis.
Treatment and Management
- Initial Approach: Metronidazole initiated, with fluid replacement therapy.
- Week 4: Lack of improvement led to the introduction of oral vancomycin.
Complications
- Fulminant Colitis Development: Rapid deterioration with diffuse abdominal pain, significant abdominal distension, and hypovolemia.
- Hospital Readmission: Required for management of potential sepsis and toxic megacolon.
- Surgical Consultation: For the risk of perforated bowel and peritonitis.
Distinctive Aspect of the Case
- Rare Presentation: Patient developed protein-losing enteropathy (ongoing damage or irritation).
- Extra-Colonic Manifestations: Reactive arthritis occurred during the infection.
Outcome
- Successful Management: The patient responded to a combination of antibiotic therapy, fluid resuscitation, and close monitoring for complications.
- Recurrent Infection: Experienced a recurrence of symptoms 2 months later and managed with
- a tapered-pulsed (T-P) fidaxomicin regimen [41].
Discussion
This case highlights the spectrum of C. difficile infection, from an asymptomatic carrier state to severe complications including fulminant colitis and extra-colonic manifestations. The case underscores the importance of early recognition, prompt treatment, and consideration of rare presentations in clinical practice. The recurrent nature of C. difficile infection emphasizes the need for ongoing vigilance and novel treatment strategies in management.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How does the transition of a patient from being an asymptomatic carrier of C. difficile to exhibiting severe symptoms such as fulminant colitis and extra-colonic manifestations influence the approach to monitoring and managing patients post-discharge?
- Given the recurrence of symptoms in the patient two months after initial treatment, what strategies can be employed in clinical practice to reduce the risk of recurrent C. difficile infections?
Epidemiology
Clostridioides difficile (CD) is the predominant cause of infectious diarrhea associated with healthcare settings worldwide [11]. The occurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection and related hospital admissions saw a rise in the 2000s. This increase was due to the emergence of the epidemic strain ribotype 027 [13]. From 1996 to 2003, the rate of discharge diagnoses for Clostridioides difficile infections CDI climbed from 31 to 61 cases per 100,000 individuals per year.
The estimated prevalence of C. difficile infection in the United States decreased between 2011 and 2017. [13]. This led to a 24% decrease in the overall adjusted burden of all hospitalizations for C. difficile infection, as reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019 [13]. CDI imposes considerable clinical, social, and economic burdens. Although the incidence of healthcare-associated CDI has decreased, cases of community-associated CDI are increasing [14]. The United States now sees an estimated 500,000 cases of CDI each year with about 30,000 of these cases resulting in death [1] [14].
Recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) often occurs following successful treatment of an initial CDI episode [15]. rCDI is an episode of CDI that occurs within 8 weeks after a prior episode [15]. It may arise from a relapse of the initial CDI with the same strain or a reinfection with a different strain. Recurrent infections are a significant concern, with between 15% to 30% of patients experiencing a recurrence after the initial episode [15]. Recurrences are more common in the elderly, those with comorbid conditions, and individuals with a history of multiple antibiotic exposures [15].
Despite C. difficile being a hospital-acquired infection, community-acquired infections account for 41% of the infections [15]. Studies have also indicated a shifting trend with an increased incidence of C. difficile infection among younger patients and patients without prior exposure to antibiotics [15].
The misuse of antibiotics heightens the risk of C. difficile infections in patients. Over half of hospitalized patients receive antibiotics, with 30% to 50% of these prescriptions being unnecessary or inappropriate [16]. The CDC estimates that up to $3.8 billion in saved medical costs over a period of 5 years through better antibiotic management [16].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Given that overuse and misuse of antibiotics are significant contributors to C. difficile infection (CDI), how might healthcare systems implement more effective antibiotic stewardship programs to reduce the incidence of CDI considering the potential savings in medical costs?
- With the observed increase in CDI among younger patients and those without prior antibiotic exposure, what factors could be contributing to this shift in the demographic profile of CDI cases?
- Considering that a significant percentage of patients experience recurrent CDI, what measures might reduce the risk of recurrence in high-risk groups such as the elderly and those with comorbid conditions?
Pathophysiology
Antibiotic treatment can disrupt the natural microbial balance in the intestines, paving the way for C. difficile colonization and subsequent toxin production, which damages the colonic epithelial cells [3]. C. diff is a spore-forming, toxin-producing bacterium which colonizes in the large intestines after a disruption in normal gut flora [17]. The underlying mechanisms of recurrent CDIs include the continued presence of C. diff spores, insufficient immune responses, and changes in the gut microbiota [17].
Toxins released by C. diff can cause inflammation, harm the intestinal lining, and result in diarrhea [17]. Adults with a robust immune system often become asymptomatic carriers. Neonates show a high asymptomatic carrier rate due to their lack of specific intestinal receptors for C. difficile [17]. The characteristic symptoms of C. difficile, infection, diarrhea, and colitis, occur secondary to the clostridial glycosylation exotoxins. These include toxin A (TcdA), an enterotoxin, and toxin B (TcdB), which is cytotoxic [17].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Considering that antibiotic treatment disrupts the gut microbiota, facilitating C. difficile colonization, how might we modify approaches to antibiotic use to preserve the natural microbial balance in the intestines?
- Given that adults with robust immune systems and neonates often become asymptomatic carriers of C. difficile, what implications does this have for the transmission and control of CDI in community and healthcare settings?
Clinical Signs and Symptoms
The clinical manifestations of CDI vary from mild diarrhea to severe, fatal conditions such as pseudomembranous colitis or toxic megacolon [18]. Although antibiotics remain the primary treatment for CDI, recent years have seen the emergence of new therapies, including antibodies targeting C. difficile toxin B and fecal microbial transfer (FMT) [19]. These treatments highlight the significance of native bacterial flora in both preventing disease in healthy individuals and contributing to disease pathogenesis when disrupted by antibiotics.
The initial and most frequent symptom of a C. difficile infection is watery diarrhea [20]. In mild cases, this involves diarrhea occurring at least three times daily accompanied by abdominal cramping or tenderness [20]. As the infection progresses in severity, the frequency of diarrhea can increase to 10 to 15 times daily [20]. Patients may also observe signs of blood in their stool (hematochezia) along with continuous abdominal pain, watery diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea, and vomiting, anorexia, fever, and an increased heart rate (tachycardia) [20].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Given the advent of new therapies like antibodies targeting C. difficile toxin B and fecal microbial transfer (FMT), how might these treatments change the standard approach to CDI in severe cases?
- How does the progression of symptoms in CDI, from mild diarrhea to fatal conditions like pseudomembranous colitis or toxic megacolon, inform the urgency and aggressiveness of treatment strategies?
Etiology
C. difficile, a gram-positive, spore-forming found in various environments, including water, air, soil, and on surfaces in hospitals [17]. It is also present in human and animal feces. This organism thrives best at a temperature around 37 degrees Celsius. Transmission of the disease occurs most often through the fecal-oral route. Most strains causing C. difficile infection produce both toxin A and toxin B, though there have been global reports of strains limited to producing toxin B [21].
Two major clostridial glucosylating toxins drive the development of C. difficile infection, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB). While many pathogenic strains associated with C. difficile infection produce both toxin A (TcdA) which is enterotoxin, and toxin B (TcdA), there are reports of strains that produce only toxin B [21]. Some strains produce a third toxin, known as binary toxin C. difficile transferase (cytolethal distending toxin), which can also play a role in enhancing the virulence and severity of the disease [22]. These toxins target the colonic epithelium and immune cells, triggering a series of cellular reactions that lead to fluid secretion, inflammation, and tissue damage, which are the defining characteristics of this condition [21].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Given C. difficile’s ability to thrive in various environments, including hospitals, and its prevalence in water, air, and soil, what strategies could be effective in minimizing environmental contamination and reducing the transmission of C. difficile in the healthcare settings?
- Considering that different strains of C. difficile produce varying toxins, with some only producing toxin B and others producing additional toxins like the binary toxin C. difficile transferase, how might this variability impact the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of C. difficile infections?
Risk Factors for Disease
Antibiotic use remains the leading risk factor for C. difficile infection [3] [16]. The disruption of the intestinal microbiota by antibiotics is long-lasting, and risk of CDI increases both during therapy and in the 3-month period following cessation of therapy.
Penicillin, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolone, and clindamycin are classes of antibiotics implicated in the disease’s cause [23]. Research indicates that clindamycin and later-generation cephalosporins are among the most common antibiotics to increase the risk of C. diff infection, while minocycline and doxycycline have a lower risk of this infection [36].
Apart from antibiotic usage, other risk factors involved in the causation include advanced age (above 65), chemotherapy, use of proton pump inhibitors, chemotherapy, chronic renal disease, chronic liver disease, community-living environment, previous C. difficile infection, malnutrition, history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or surgery involving the intestines including the manipulation of the gastrointestinal tract (tube feeding) [24] [25].
The rising risk of acquiring C. difficile with each day of hospital stay implies that the length of hospitalization might serve as an indicator for the extent and duration of exposure to the organism, the probability of encountering antibiotics, and the seriousness of the underlying illness [26]. The risk of CDI peaks, showing a 7- to 10-fold increase, during and within the first month following antibiotic exposure [27].
Vitamin D could play a significant role in safeguarding against CDI, as low levels are an independent risk factor for various groups, including general patients with community-associated disease, older individuals, and patients suffering from underlying inflammatory bowel disease [28].
Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with an increased risk of C. difficile infection, as they can alter the stomach’s natural acidity, creating a more favorable environment for the bacteria to thrive [26]. In a retrospective analysis involving 754 patients with healthcare-associated CDI, ongoing use of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) indicated a 50% higher risk of recurrence. In comparison, re-exposure to antibiotics was associated with a lower increase in risk, at 30% [26].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Given that certain classes of antibiotics, such as clindamycin and later-generation cephalosporins increase the risk of C. difficile infection, how might healthcare providers balance the necessity of these antibiotics for treating infections against their potential to cause CDI?
- Besides antibiotic use, how do factors like advanced age, chemotherapy, proton pump inhibitor usage, and chronic diseases contribute to the risk of developing C. difficile infection?
- Considering the finding that low Vitamin D levels and the use of proton pump inhibitors, which alter stomach acidity, increases the risk of CDI, what implications does this have for the management of patients’ gut environment and nutritional status in preventing CDI?
Long-Term Impact
Recurrent C. difficile (rCDI) is a gastrointestinal infection caused by C. difficile bacteria and linked to dysbiosis, or imbalance, of the gastrointestinal microbiome [38]. Long term complications include an increased risk of chronic gastrointestinal discomfort, a higher likelihood of hospital readmission, and potential for severe complications like toxic megacolon, bowel perforation, and sepsis [14].
The psychological impact, including anxiety and depression, and the financial burden on both patients and the healthcare system are significant [14]. Patients at substantial risk for poor outcomes might benefit from earlier, more aggressive strategies to restore or maintain the microbiome including fecal microbiota transplantation [30] [31].
Symptoms analogous to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) occur with greater frequency post-CDI with estimates that 25% experience IBS-like symptoms for at least six months following successful treatment [32]. Ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms can interfere with nutrient absorption, leading to deficiencies that can impact overall health [40].
Additional research revealed heightened levels of fear and anxiety, as indicated by a threefold increase of depression among respondents compared to the general US adult population [33]. Patients who have experienced an episode of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may continue to be at risk for gastrointestinal symptoms associated with CDI for a period of up to two years [40].
It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of these potential long-term complications when managing patients with C. diff infections. This knowledge is crucial for effective patient education, management, and support.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Considering the long-term complications of recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI), including severe gastrointestinal issues and psychological impacts, how might early and aggressive interventions such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) alter the course of the disease
- Given the high incidence of symptoms like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) following CDI, and the extended period during which patients may remain at risk for gastrointestinal symptoms, what strategies should healthcare professionals employ to support these patients?
Treatment
The initial step in managing CDI involves discontinuing the triggering antibiotic treatment [34]. According to the clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), treatment for initial CDI episodes depends on disease severity [26].
For non-severe cases (white blood cell count ≤15.0 × 10^9/L and serum creatinine level <1.5 mg/dL), three treatment options include:
- Vancomycin 125 mg orally, four times daily for 10 days [26].
- Fidaxomicin 200 mg orally, twice daily for 10 days [26].
- Metronidazole 500 mg orally, three times daily for 10 days (if vancomycin or fidaxomicin are not available) [26].
For severe cases (white blood cell count >15.0 × 10^9/L or serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL), two treatment options include:
- Vancomycin 125 mg orally, four times daily for 10 days [26].
- Fidaxomicin 200 mg orally, twice daily for 10 days [26].
Fulminant CDI cases, characterized by symptoms like hypotension, shock, ileus, or toxic megacolon:
- Oral vancomycin 500 mg or via nasogastric tube four times a day, alongside intravenous metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours [26].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- What factors should clinicians consider when choosing among treatment options like vancomycin, fidaxomicin, and metronidazole for different severity levels?
- Given that the initial management of CDI involves discontinuing the triggering antibiotic, how might this approach impact the overall treatment plan for a patient, if the initial antibiotic warranted treatment for a critical condition?
Research Findings
Recent research focuses on understanding the microbiome’s role in CDIs and recurrent infections. A disturbance in the composition and function of the gut microbiome diminishes this colonization resistance, a factor linked to various gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal illnesses [39]. A notable instance of this is the occurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and its recurrent episodes, which often arise following dysbiosis induced by systemic antibiotic use [39].
Studies have shown that a diverse gut microbiota is protective against CDIs, and efforts to develop microbiome-based therapies are underway [39]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved VOWST™, a microbiota-based therapeutic to prevent recurrence of C. difficile Infection (CDI) in adults following antibacterial [38].
Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) are emerging as effective strategies for restoring gut flora balance [36]. Recent guidelines emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship and infection control measures in preventing CDIs [37].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How might the emerging understanding of the gut microbiome’s role in CDIs in relation to dysbiosis and colonization resistance, influence future approaches to both the prevention and treatment of CDI, including the development and application of microbiome-based therapies such as probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and FDA-approved treatments like VOWST™?
- How can healthcare systems and providers integrate a comprehensive approach to the management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) that focuses on pharmacological treatments and addresses the broader psychological, social, and economic impacts on patients while working towards reducing healthcare costs and improving preventative measures against recurrent and community-acquired CDI?
- How can providers tailor patient education and management to address both the physical and psychological aspects of post-CDI syndrome?
Conclusion
Recurrent C. diff infections pose a significant challenge in healthcare, with profound long-term impacts on patient health and healthcare resources [14]. Understanding the risk factors and pathophysiology of these infections is crucial in developing effective prevention and treatment strategies [14]. The treatment and management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) should be comprehensive, encompassing pharmacological approaches and a holistic consideration of the patient’s experience.
This includes addressing the psychological and social impacts during and after CDI, as well as exploring avenues for financial support, supportive services, and options for medical leave from work [14]. From the perspective of healthcare resources and institutions, it is critical to focus on reducing costs and mitigating fiscal losses that arise from reimbursement penalties and employ measures to prevent recurrent CDI (rCDI) and community-acquired CDI. Future research in microbiome science and new therapeutic approaches holds promise for better management of this burdensome condition.
References + Disclaimer
- Heinlen, L., & Ballard, J. D. (2010). Clostridium difficile infection. The American journal of the medical sciences, 340(3), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e939d8
- Rodríguez, C., Van Broeck, J., Taminiau, B., Delmée, M., & Daube, G. (2016). Clostridium difficile infection: Early history, diagnosis and molecular strain typing methods. Microbial Pathogenesis, 97, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.05.018
- Schäffler, H., & Breitrück, A. (2018). Clostridium difficile – From Colonization to Infection. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00646
- Markovska, R., Dimitrov, G., Gergova, R., & Boyanova, L. (2023). Clostridioides difficile, a New “Superbug.” Microorganisms, 11(4), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040845
- Zhu, D., Sorg, J. A., & Sun, X. (2018). Clostridioides difficile Biology: Sporulation, Germination, and Corresponding Therapies for C. difficile Infection. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00029
- Clinical C. diff Q & A. (2022, October 25). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/cdiff/clinicians/faq.html
- Fletcher, J. R., Pike, C. M., Parsons, R. J., Rivera, A. J., Foley, M. H., McLaren, M. R., Montgomery, S. A., & Theriot, C. M. (2021). Clostridioides difficile exploits toxin-mediated inflammation to alter the host nutritional landscape and exclude competitors from the gut microbiota. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20746-4
- Walter, K. (2021, February 4). Significant costs linked to Hospital-Acquired C. difficile. HCP Live. https://www.hcplive.com/view/costs-hospitalacquired-c-difficile
- Nygren, E., Strömberg, L. G., Logenius, J., Husmark, U., Löfström, C., & Bergström, B. (2023). Potential sources of contamination on textiles and hard surfaces identified as high-touch sites near the patient environment. PLOS ONE, 18(7), e0287855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287855
- Di Bella, S., Ascenzi, P., Siarakas, S., Petrosillo, N., & Di Masi, A. (2016). Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B: Insights into Pathogenic Properties and Extraintestinal Effects. Toxins, 8(5), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050134
- Ragusa, R. (2018, June 1). Healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile infection: role of correct hand hygiene in cross-infection control. PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6069405/
- Durham, S. H., Le, P., & Cassano, A. T. (2020). Navigating changes in Clostridioides difficile prevention and treatment. Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 26(12-a Suppl), S3–S23. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12-a.s3
- Guh, A., Mu, Y., Winston, L. G., Johnston, H., Olson, D. M., Farley, M. M., Wilson, L., Holzbauer, S., Phipps, E. C., Dumyati, G., Beldavs, Z. G., Kainer, M. A., Karlsson, M., Gerding, D. N., & McDonald, L. C. (2020). Trends in U.S. Burden of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Outcomes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382(14), 1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1910215
- Feuerstadt, P., Theriault, N., & Tillotson, G. (2023). The burden of CDI in the United States: a multifactorial challenge. BMC Infectious Diseases, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08096-0
- Song, J. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2019). Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection: Risk factors, treatment, and prevention. Gut And Liver, 13(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18071
- Mada, P. K. (2023, January 23). Clostridioides difficile Infection. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431054/
- Clostridioides difficile infection in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis – UpToDate. (2024). UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clostridioides-difficile-infection-in-adults-clinical-manifestations-and-diagnosis/print
- C. difficile infection – Symptoms and causes – Mayo Clinic. (2023, September 1). Mayo Clinic. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/c-difficile/symptoms-causes/syc-20351691
- Roshan, N., Clancy, A., & Borody, T. J. (2020). Faecal Microbiota Transplantation is Effective for the Initial Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection: A Retrospective Clinical Review. Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 9(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00339-w
- NHS inform. (2023, May 29). Clostridium difficile | NHS inform. NHS Inform. https://www.nhsinform.scot/illnesses-and-conditions/infections-and-poisoning/clostridium-difficile/
- Chandrasekaran, R., & Lacy, D. B. (2017). The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 41(6), 723–750. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux048
- Eng, S. C., & Surawicz, C. M. (2004). Colitis pseudomembranous. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 379–381). https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-386860-2/00601-8
- Banawas, S. (2018). Clostridium difficile Infections: A Global Overview of Drug Sensitivity and Resistance Mechanisms. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8414257
- Dicks, L. M. T. (2023). Biofilm Formation of Clostridioides difficile, Toxin Production and Alternatives to Conventional Antibiotics in the Treatment of CDI. Microorganisms, 11(9), 2161. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092161
- Sartelli, M., Di Bella, S., McFarland, L. V., Khanna, S., Furuya‐Kanamori, L., Abuzeid, N., Abu‐Zidan, F. M., Ansaloni, L., Augustin, G., Bala, M., Ben-Ishay, O., Biffl, W. L., Brecher, S. M., Camacho‐Ortiz, A., Caínzos, M., Chan, S., Cherry-Bukowiec, J. R., Clanton, J., Catena, F., . . . Catena, F. (2019). 2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0228-3
- McDonald, L. C., Gerding, D. N., Johnson, S., Bakken, J. S., Carroll, K. C., Coffin, S., Dubberke, E. R., Garey, K. W., Gould, C. V., Kelly, C. P., Loo, V. G., Sammons, J. S., Sandora, T. J., & Wilcox, M. H. (2018). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical Infectious Diseases, 66(7), e1–e48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix1085
- Hensgens, M., Goorhuis, A., Dekkers, O. M., & Kuijper, E. J. (2011). Time interval of increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection after exposure to antibiotics. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 67(3), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr508
- Fletcher, J., Cooper, S. C., Ghosh, S., & Hewison, M. (2019). The role of Vitamin D in Inflammatory bowel Disease: Mechanism to Management. Nutrients, 11(5), 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11051019
- Oshima, T., Wu, L., Li, M., Fukui, H., Watari, J., & Miwa, H. (2017). Magnitude and direction of the association between Clostridium difficile infection and proton pump inhibitors in adults and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Gastroenterology, 53(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-017-1369-3
- Konijeti GG, Sauk J, Shrime MG, Gupta M, Ananthakrishnan AN. Cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for management of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a decision analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:1507–14.
- Kelly CR, Khoruts A, Staley C, Sadowsky MJ, ABD M, Alani M, et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrence in multiply recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Ann Intern Med 2016; 165:609–16.
- Versporten, A. (2018). The global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance (global-PPS): Results on Clostridium difficile acute diarrhea (CDAD). ECCMID. http://www.global-pps.com/wp-content/uploads/BRCH-Global-PPS-180406-web-Xs.pdf.
- Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2017). 2016 national survey on drug use and health: Methodological summary and definitions. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-MethodSummDefs-2016/NSDUH-MethodSummDefs-2016.htm.Return to ref 27 in article
- Tsigrelis, C. (2020). Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: Recognition, management, prevention. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 87(6), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.87gr.20001
- Salamon, M. (2023, November 1). Long-lasting C. diff infections: A threat to the gut. Harvard Health. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/long-lasting-c-diff-infections-a-threat-to-the-gut-202311012987
- Wortelboer, K., Nieuwdorp, M., & Herrema, H. (2019). Fecal microbiota transplantation beyond Clostridioides difficile infections. EBioMedicine, 44, 716–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.066
- Coffey, K., Keller, S. C., Anderson, D. J., Deloney, V. M., Harris, A. D., Henderson, D. K., Milstone, A. M., Morgan, D. J., Rock, C., Schweizer, M. L., & Chiotos, K. (2023). Infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship program needs and practices in 2021: A survey of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 44(6), 948–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.222
- Connolly, L. (2023, June 3). New treatment for recurrence of C. difficile infection approved by FDA. News. https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/new-treatment-for-recurrence-of-c-difficile-infection-approved-by-fda/2023/05
- Seekatz, A. M., Safdar, N., & Khanna, S. (2022). The role of the gut microbiome in colonization resistance and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 15, 175628482211343. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848221134396
- Barlam, T. F., Soria-Saucedo, R., Ameli, O., Cabral, H., Kaplan, W., & Kazis, L. E. (2018). Retrospective analysis of long-term gastrointestinal symptoms after Clostridium difficile infection in a nonelderly cohort. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209152
- Skinner, A. M., Tan, X., Sirbu, B. D., Danziger, L. H., Gerding, D. N., & Johnson, S. (2021). A Tapered-pulsed Fidaxomicin Regimen Following Treatment in Patients With Multiple Clostridioides difficile Infection Recurrences. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 73(6), 1107–1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab233
Disclaimer:
Use of Course Content. The courses provided by NCC are based on industry knowledge and input from professional nurses, experts, practitioners, and other individuals and institutions. The information presented in this course is intended solely for the use of healthcare professionals taking this course, for credit, from NCC. The information is designed to assist healthcare professionals, including nurses, in addressing issues associated with healthcare. The information provided in this course is general in nature and is not designed to address any specific situation. This publication in no way absolves facilities of their responsibility for the appropriate orientation of healthcare professionals. Hospitals or other organizations using this publication as a part of their own orientation processes should review the contents of this publication to ensure accuracy and compliance before using this publication. Knowledge, procedures or insight gained from the Student in the course of taking classes provided by NCC may be used at the Student’s discretion during their course of work or otherwise in a professional capacity. The Student understands and agrees that NCC shall not be held liable for any acts, errors, advice or omissions provided by the Student based on knowledge or advice acquired by NCC. The Student is solely responsible for his/her own actions, even if information and/or education was acquired from a NCC course pertaining to that action or actions. By clicking “complete” you are agreeing to these terms of use.
➁ Complete Survey
Give us your thoughts and feedback
➂ Click Complete
To receive your certificate