Course
Management of Pelvic Trauma
Course Highlights
- In this Management of Pelvic Trauma course, we will learn about pelvic anatomy, including the sacrum, coccyx, innominate bones, and major vascular structures.
- You’ll also learn key blood vessels susceptible to injury during pelvic trauma and understand their clinical significance in hemorrhage control.
- You’ll leave this course with a broader understanding of the Tile, Young-Burgess, World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), and AAST Vaginal Injury Classification in the classification systems to categorize pelvic fractures and vaginal injuries based on anatomical patterns and hemodynamic stability.
About
Contact Hours Awarded: 1
Course By:
R.E. Hengsterman MSN, RN
Begin Now
Read Course | Complete Survey | Claim Credit
➀ Read and Learn
The following course content
Introduction
Traumatic pelvic injuries result from high-energy trauma and can be life-threatening, leading to lifelong disabilities. Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients between the ages of 15 and 24 [1]. Severe pelvic fractures from high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle collisions or significant falls, cause extensive damage to the pelvic bones and surrounding soft tissues, including major blood vessels, nerves, and vital organs, leading to life-threatening hemorrhage and neurological deficits [1]. These injuries often involve multi-system trauma, complicating management and increasing the risk of mortality and long-term complications due to associated damage to organs like the liver, spleen, kidneys, and lungs [1].
Trauma remains the leading cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 24 and accounts for 30% of all intensive care unit (ICU) admissions per year [1]. Traumatic injuries range from minor wounds to severe, complex conditions that can induce shock and multi-system organ dysfunction. Such injuries are associated with additional traumas, increased transfusion requirements, and prolonged rehabilitation periods.
Understanding the evaluation and management of traumatic pelvic injuries is essential for all healthcare professionals. An interprofessional team approach is crucial in managing patients with pelvic fractures due to the complexity and potential complications involved.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Why might traumatic pelvic injuries, which result from high-energy trauma, lead to such high mortality rates and long-term disabilities among individuals aged 15 to 24?
- In what ways does an interprofessional team approach enhance the management of patients with pelvic fractures, and what potential complications could arise by not implementing this collaborative strategy?
Anatomical Concerns
The pelvis is a ring-like bony structure composed of the sacrum, coccyx, and innominate bones—the pubis, ischium, and ilium—which converge to form the acetabulum [2]. The innominate bones join at the pubic symphysis anteriorly, forming the pelvis, which houses vital structures such as blood vessels, nerves, urogenital organs, and the rectum [3].
The pelvis is associated with several major vascular structures. At the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4), the aorta divides into the common iliac arteries, which further split into the internal and external iliac arteries at the sacroiliac joint [4]. Pelvic trauma injures the gluteal artery, which branches from the iliac artery and exits the pelvis at the notch [1]. Other arteries susceptible to injury include the inferior gluteal, rectal, obturator, and vesical arteries. Accompanying veins are also prone to damage due to their proximity to the arteries, leading to a high incidence of combined vascular injuries [1][5]. The risk of hematoma formation and shock increases fracture severity, making hemorrhage a cause of morbidity and mortality in these cases [6].
While nerve injuries are less common than vascular injuries in pelvic trauma, they do occur [1]. Pelvic injuries to the sacroiliac joint and acetabulum often affect the lumbosacral plexus due to its proximity to these sites [7]. Severe pelvic trauma can result in root avulsion. Injuries to the lumbar plexus are less common and result from traction or compression caused by retroperitoneal bleeding [8].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How does the anatomical complexity of the pelvis, including its proximity to major blood vessels and nerves, contribute to the substantial risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits in pelvic trauma patients?
- Why do pelvic traumas involve combined vascular injuries, and how do these injuries impact patient management and prognosis?
Case Study: Complex Open Pelvic Fracture in an 8-Year-Old
Presentation and Initial Assessment: An 8-year-old girl in rural North Carolina sustained a complex when an off-road utility vehicle (UTV) overturned. Upon arrival to the trauma center, the trauma team initiated a massive transfusion protocol due to signs of severe hemorrhage and unstable vitals. The primary survey identified a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 14, and the team applied a binder due to fractures. They intubated the patient to secure the airway and proceeded with imaging.
Imaging and Diagnosis: A series of diagnostic tests, including X-rays and CT scans, revealed multiple traumatic injuries. The team identified the following injuries:
- Bilateral superior and inferior pubic rami fractures
- Right iliac bone fracture
- Bilateral sacral fractures
- Large pelvic hematoma with active hemorrhage
- Skull fracture with a hemotympanum
- Nondisplaced left clavicle fracture
- Degloving injuries of the urogenital, left thigh, groin, and right buttock areas
Given the severity of the pelvic injuries and ongoing hemorrhage, the team decided to proceed with pelvic embolization.
Surgical Intervention: The patient underwent embolization of pelvic arteries to control hemorrhage. Despite embolization, bleeding from injuries persisted, and surgeons performed laparotomy.
Physicians classified the patient’s fractures as bilateral unstable lateral compression Type 1 fractures. The orthopedic trauma team employed an internal-external fixator (INFIX), a subcutaneous temporary internal fixation device, which requires careful management to prevent infection and facilitate rehabilitation [9].
Challenges and Complications: Open pelvic fractures carry high morbidity and mortality rates due to the combination of skeletal immaturity and associated injuries [10]. The patient’s complex injuries, including the degloving and urogenital trauma, required innovative surgical approaches. In this instance, the INFIX provided both biomechanical stability and reduced infection risk, enhancing the patient’s recovery [11].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- What factors might have influenced the trauma team’s decision to proceed with pelvic embolization despite the patient’s ongoing hemorrhage, and how did this intervention impact the subsequent surgical management?
- How did applying an internal external fixator (INFIX) help the patient recover, and what factors should healthcare providers address to prevent infection and support rehabilitation of pelvic fractures in pediatric patients?
Etiology
The pelvic ring is a strong structure that requires substantial force to disrupt, making pelvic fractures uncommon. When pelvic fractures occur, they result from events such as motor vehicle collisions, falls from heights, or incidents where vehicles strike pedestrians or cyclists.
Pelvic fractures make up 5% of all traumatic fractures, with 30% being isolated cases. They occur in 10–20% of severe trauma patients and correlate with higher trauma severity scores. Although rare, pelvic fractures involve injuries in 12–62% of patients. Pelvic trauma causes high mortality rates of 8–15% due to active bleeding and associated injuries to the head, abdomen, or chest [1][12].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Given that pelvic fractures require substantial force to occur and are uncommon, what underlying factors might contribute to their association with higher trauma severity scores and increased mortality rates?
- Considering that pelvic trauma often involves active bleeding and injuries to other vital areas such as the head, abdomen, or chest, how should emergency medical protocols prioritize the management of these multiple injuries to improve patient survival outcomes?
Epidemiology
Pelvic fractures comprise 10% of fractures resulting from blunt trauma [13]. Among these patients, more than 16% have at least one associated injury, with intra-abdominal organs—the liver, spleen, and kidneys—being the most affected [1][13]. Urogenital injuries account for over 40% of associated injuries [1][14] Up to 24% of patients with pelvic trauma sustain a urethral injury [14] [15]. In males, these injuries most occur at the bulbomembranous junction [16]. Bladder Lacerations occur in about 20% of cases involving pelvic trauma [17]. 1% to 2% of pelvic fracture cases involve injuries to the rectum, while lacerations of the vagina occur in 2% to 4% of incidents [1] [18].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
Given that over 40% of associated injuries in pelvic fractures involve urogenital structures and significant percentages affect organs like the liver, spleen, and kidneys, how should healthcare teams prioritize diagnostic evaluations and treatment strategies to manage these complex, multi-system injuries and improve patient outcomes?
AAST Vaginal Injury Classification
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) categorizes vaginal injuries into three degrees [1] [18]:
- First-degree: Contusions, hematomas, and superficial lacerations involving the mucosa.
- Second-degree: Lacerations involving deep fat or muscle tissue.
- Third-degree: Lacerations that involve the cervix, peritoneum, or extend into adjacent organs.
In adults, open pelvic fractures represent about 2% to 5% of all pelvic ring injuries and carry an overall mortality rate of up to 50% [19]. Studies reported mortality rates for children reaching 25% [20]. However, advancements in surgical techniques and improvements in standards of care have led to a decrease in mortality rates in recent studies.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How does the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Vaginal Injury Classification enhance the diagnosis and management of vaginal injuries in pelvic fracture patients, and what are the implications of accurately categorizing these injuries for patient treatment plans?
- Considering that open pelvic fractures carry high mortality rates in both adults and children, what specific advancements in surgical techniques and standards of care have contributed to the recent decrease in mortality rates, and how can providers implement these improvements to enhance patient survival and recovery?
Pathophysiology
Disruption of the pelvic ring increases the internal volume of the pelvis, which decreases the tamponade effect of the retroperitoneal space and allows for increased blood loss [1][21]. There are two primary classification systems for pelvic fractures: the Tile classification and the Young-Burgess classification [1][22].
Tile Classification
- Type A: Fractures that neither rotate nor move on an axis. Fractures that include avulsions and injuries.
- Type B: Fractures with rotational instability but vertical stability.
- Type C: Fractures where bones can rotate and move up or down.
Young-Burgess Classification
This system classifies pelvic fractures based on the mechanism of injury:
- Anteroposterior Compression (APC):
- Often unstable and referred to as “open book” fractures.
- Associated with pelvic and retroperitoneal hemorrhage.
- Result from head-on motor vehicle collisions.
- Lateral Compression (LC):
- Most common type of pelvic fracture.
- Often stable but can be associated with bladder rupture.
- Result from side-impact collisions, such as T-bone accidents or pedestrians struck from the side.
- Vertical Shear (VS):
- Often unstable.
- Require substantial force on one or both hemipelves
- Cause complete ligamentous injury.
- Combined Mechanism (CM):
- Involves a combination of the above mechanisms.
Limitations of Traditional Classifications
Both the Tile and Young-Burgess classifications focus on the anatomical aspects of pelvic fractures but do not consider the patient’s hemodynamic stability [1][22]. To address this limitation, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) developed a classification system that incorporates both anatomical injury and hemodynamic status to guide treatment decisions [23].
WSES Classification and Management
The WSES classification divides pelvic injuries into three categories: minor, moderate, and severe [24].
Minor Injuries (WSES Grade I)
Minor injuries under WSES Grade I involve fractures in patients with hemodynamic stability [24]. This category includes Grade I fractures such as Anteroposterior Compression Type I (APC I) and Lateral Compression Type I (LC I) fractures. Management involves nonoperative treatment, as these injuries are stable and do not usually require surgical intervention [24].
Moderate Injuries (WSES Grades II and III)
Moderate injuries encompass WSES Grades II and III and involve unstable fractures in hemodynamically stable patients [24]. Grade II includes fractures like APC II, APC III, LC II, and LC III, while Grade III comprises Vertical Shear (VS) and Combined Mechanism (CM) fractures [24]. Management for moderate injuries involves applying a pelvic binder at the scene to stabilize the pelvis [1][24]. If CT imaging shows a blush—indicating bleeding—consider angioembolization to control hemorrhage [1].
Severe Injuries (WSES Grade IV)
Classify injuries as WSES Grade IV for patients with instability of blood circulation, regardless of fracture stability [24]. This category includes any fracture pattern in a hemodynamically unstable patient. Immediate management involves the application of a pelvic binder in the field to provide initial stabilization [24]. Upon arrival at the hospital, initiate interventions such as packing, REBOA, and angioembolization to control bleeding and stabilize the patient.
By incorporating both the anatomical classification and the patient’s hemodynamic status, the WSES system provides a comprehensive framework for managing pelvic fractures. The trauma team manages minor injuries without surgery. Moderate injuries may require interventions like angioembolization if clinicians detect bleeding, and severe injuries necessitate strategies to control hemorrhage and stabilize the patient.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How does the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification system enhance the management of pelvic fractures by incorporating both anatomical injury and hemodynamic status, compared to the traditional Tile and Young-Burgess classifications?
- Considering the limitations of the Tile and Young-Burgess classification systems in addressing hemodynamic stability, what are the potential benefits and challenges of implementing the WSES classification in clinical practice for guiding treatment decisions in pelvic trauma patients?
Initial Approach to Trauma Patients
Trauma patient management follows Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines, focusing on rapid recognition and stabilization of life-threatening injuries [25]. An extensive initial history is unnecessary; EMS personnel provide a brief overview upon the patient’s arrival at the emergency department [25]. After stabilizing the patient, obtain a history that focuses on the mechanism of injury, whether the patient walked at the scene, and any signs of bowel or bladder incontinence, numbness, or weakness. In alert patients, a thorough history and physical examination are sensitive for detecting pelvic trauma [1].
The initial evaluation, known as the primary survey, uses the mnemonic ABCDE to address immediate threats [25]:
- A: Airway and Cervical Spine Protection: Assess airway patency by asking the patient to speak; protect the cervical spine when suspecting a neck injury.
- B: Breathing: Observe chest movement and listen for breath sounds to ensure adequate ventilation.
- C: Circulation: Evaluate pulse, skin color, and capillary refill to assess circulatory status and identify signs of shock or hemorrhage.
- D: Disability: Assess neurological status using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); check pupil size and reactivity.
- E: Exposure and Environmental Control: Expose the patient to identify all injuries while preventing hypothermia.
Following the primary survey, the secondary survey involves a comprehensive head-to-toe examination.
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- How do the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines prioritize the assessment and stabilization of a trauma patient, and why is the ABCDE approach essential in identifying and addressing life-threatening injuries?
- In what ways does obtaining a focused history after initial stabilization contribute to the detection and management of pelvic trauma, and how can healthcare professionals balance the need for rapid intervention with the collection of critical patient information?
Treatment / Management
Pelvic fractures, regardless of their severity, can become life-threatening and require prompt and effective management. Treatment begins with addressing the ABCs—airway, breathing, and circulation—during the primary survey [25]. Adequate resuscitation is crucial; all trauma patients should receive two large-bore intravenous lines upon arrival [25]. The trauma team manages hypotension with aggressive fluid resuscitation, followed by blood product administration if it persists [26][27].
Apply binders when signs of ring disruption occur in patients, regardless of stability [1]. The binder serves two main purposes: it compresses bleeding from bone fractures and reduces the pelvic volume to promote tamponade of bleeding vessels [1][28]. Place the binder over the greater trochanters and pubic symphysis to adduct the legs and decrease pelvic volume [28]. Do not use pelvic binders in fractures resulting from lateral compression fractures as they may increase bleeding [1][28].
Patients who are stable but show evidence of bleeding on a CT scan should undergo angioembolization [29]. Interventional radiology performs this procedure with access via the femoral artery. Angioembolization succeeds in 85% to 100% of cases [1] [30]. If the femoral artery is not accessible, interventional radiologists may opt for the brachial or axillary artery [29][30]. The procedure involves visualizing and embolizing vessels, often branches of the iliac artery like the gluteal, obturator, and pudendal arteries. An angiogram confirms that bleeding has stopped. Early angioembolization within 90 minutes of arrival improves survival [29[30]. For unstable patients, immediate interventions are critical. While some advocate for immediate laparotomy, others suggest that angioembolization should precede surgery due to the likelihood of arterial bleeding and the correlation between early embolization and improved survival [29[30].
Preperitoneal Packing (PPP) is another option in centers without IR capabilities [31]. PPP involves placing surgical pads against the peritoneum to create tamponade and is quicker than angioembolization. Surgeons make a midline or Pfannenstiel incision, insert pads into the space before the peritoneum, and control bleeding [31].
Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is an alternative to aortic cross-clamping [32]. REBOA involves inserting a balloon catheter to occlude the aorta, minimizing life-threatening hemorrhage [32]. It is useful in pelvic trauma, with zone III (infrarenal) occlusion being effective and causing minimal visceral injury [32]. Access the femoral artery; if it is unavailable, use the brachial or carotid artery. Inflate the balloon to occlude the aorta, keeping inflation time under 30 minutes and not exceeding 60 minutes. After deflation, changes in blood flow may occur, so consider intermittent reinflation if necessary. Transport the patient quickly to IR or the operating room for treatment.
Unstable pelvic fractures require surgical fixation [1] [33]. Early fixation improves pain control, fracture reduction, mobilization, and bleeding control. The trauma team resuscitates the patient, then performs repair [33].
Timing of Surgery: Patients who are stable or “borderline” can undergo definitive repair within 24 hours of injury [33]. In polytrauma patients with derangements, delay surgery until they stabilize, waiting at least four days to reduce complications [33].
Surgical Techniques: Posterior ring injury reconstructions are crucial for functional outcomes [1] [34]. Management varies by fracture type:
- APC I and LC I: Managed without surgery.
- APC II: Managed with anterior symphyseal plating.
- APC III: Treated with anterior symphyseal plating or external fixation plus posterior stabilization with sacroiliac screws.
- LC II: Treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the ilium.
- LC III and VS: Require posterior stabilization with sacroiliac screws.
Management of Associated Injuries
- Bladder Injuries: Treatment depends on the injury’s location.
- Extraperitoneal bladder injuries Physicians treat bladder injuries outside the peritoneum with catheter drainage, avoiding surgery; injuries inside the peritoneum require repair through surgery [17]. A Foley catheter remains in place for about 14 days, followed by a repeat cystogram before removal.
- Urethral Injuries: Management of complete transections includes a suprapubic catheter and delayed repair [17]. Manage partial transactions with a Foley catheterization. Close monitoring is necessary to detect potential fistula formation.
- Rectal Injuries: When possible, debride sigmoid and intraperitoneal injuries [37]. For those involving less than half the circumference, consider repair to reduce complications. For larger injuries, perform resection with anastomosis, with or without diversion. Treat injuries with repair and colostomy; drainage or washout is not necessary.
- Vaginal Lacerations: Treatment depends on the severity. First-degree injuries may only require gauze packing, while second and third-degree injuries necessitate surgical repair performed by a gynecologist [35].
Self Quiz
Ask yourself...
- Considering the various management strategies for pelvic fractures, such as angioembolization, preperitoneal packing (PPP), and Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA), what factors should healthcare teams evaluate when deciding the most appropriate intervention for a patient presenting with unstable pelvic fractures and ongoing hemorrhage?
- How does the timing and choice of surgical fixation techniques, such as anterior symphyseal plating or posterior stabilization with sacroiliac screws, impact the overall outcomes and recovery process for patients with distinct types of pelvic fractures, and what are the considerations for polytrauma patients with multiple injuries?
- How do Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines in conjunction with comprehensive classification systems like the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) enhance the multidisciplinary management of pelvic fractures, and why is this integration critical for reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes in high-energy trauma cases?
Conclusion
Pelvic injuries, often resulting from high-energy trauma such as motor vehicle collisions or falls from significant heights, can be life-threatening and lead to long-term disabilities [1]. These injuries require an interprofessional team approach due to their complexity and the potential for severe complications, including hemorrhage and multi-organ dysfunction.
Trauma remains the leading cause of death among individuals aged 15 to 24 and accounts for a substantial percentage of intensive care unit admissions per year [36]. Understanding the evaluation and management of pelvic fractures is essential for healthcare professionals to improve patient outcomes.
Management of pelvic injuries begins with following Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines, focusing on rapid assessment and stabilization using the ABCDE approach—Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure [25]. Classification systems like the Tile and Young-Burgess methods categorize fractures based on anatomical and mechanical factors but do not account for hemodynamic stability [1][22].
The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification addresses this by incorporating both injury type and patient stability, guiding treatment decisions ranging from nonoperative management to surgical interventions like angioembolization, preperitoneal packing, or resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) [23] [32]. Early surgical fixation when necessary and addressing associated injuries to organs such as the bladder, urethra, rectum, and vagina to reduce morbidity and mortality [1][33].
Effective evaluation and multidisciplinary management of pelvic fractures, guided by comprehensive classification systems and prompt interventions, are crucial for reducing mortality and improving patient outcomes in trauma care.
References + Disclaimer
- Tullington, J. E., & Blecker, N. (2023, August 8). Pelvic trauma. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556070/
- Wobser, A. M., Adkins, Z., & Wobser, R. W. (2023, July 24). Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis: bones (Ilium, ischium, and pubis). StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519524/
- Chaudhry, S. R., Nahian, A., & Chaudhry, K. (2023, July 25). Anatomy, abdomen and pelvis, pelvis. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482258/
- Lyons, A., & Singh, R. P. (2017). Vascularized iliac crest grafts. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 562–570). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7020-6056-4.00041-1
- Pelvic trauma. (2024, January 1). PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32310530/
- Mondie, C., Maguire, N. J., & Rentea, R. M. (2024, June 7). Retroperitoneal hematoma. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558928/
- Bazira, P. J. (2021). Clinically applied anatomy of the pelvis. Surgery (Oxford), 39(6), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2021.04.002
- Weatherford, B., MD. (2024). Pelvic ring fractures – trauma – orthobullets. https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/1030/pelvic-ring-fractures
- Abo-Elsoud, M., Awad, M. I., Karim, M. A., Khaled, S., & Abdelmoneim, M. (2023). Internal fixator vs external fixator in the management of unstable pelvic ring injuries: A prospective comparative cohort study. World Journal of Orthopedics, 14(7), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v14.i7.562
- Ghosh, S., Aggarwal, S., Kumar, V., Patel, S., & Kumar, P. (2019). Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in adults: Our experience at a tertiary hospital. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 22(3), 138–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.03.003
- Habboush, Y., Yarrarapu, S. N. S., & Guzman, N. (2023, September 4). Infection control. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519017/
- Incagnoli, P., Puidupin, A., Ausset, S., Beregi, J. P., Bessereau, J., Bobbia, X., Brun, J., Brunel, E., Buléon, C., Choukroun, J., Combes, X., David, J. S., Desfemmes, F., Garrigue, D., Hanouz, J., Plénier, I., Rongieras, F., Vivien, B., Gauss, T., . . . Kipnis, E. (2018). Early management of severe pelvic injury (first 24 hours). Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 38(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2018.12.003
- Lee, M. J., Wright, A., Cline, M., Mazza, M. B., Alves, T., & Chong, S. (2019). Pelvic fractures and associated genitourinary and vascular injuries: A multisystem review of pelvic trauma. American Journal of Roentgenology, 213(6), 1297–1306. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.21050
- Wiegand, L. R., & Brandes, S. B. (2024). Genitourinary tract injuries. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 423-430.e1). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-69787-3.00071-x
- Leslie, S. W., Nelson, Q., & Baker, J. (2023, July 24). Urethral injury. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554575/
- Alwaal, A., Zaid, U. B., Blaschko, S. D., Harris, C. R., Gaither, T. W., McAninch, J. W., & Breyer, B. N. (2014). The incidence, causes, mechanism, risk factors, classification, and diagnosis of pelvic fracture urethral injury. Arab Journal of Urology, 13(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2014.08.006
- Kang, L., & Geube, A. (2023, May 22). Bladder trauma. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557875/
- Chalmers, D. J., & Vemulakonda, V. M. (2016). Pediatric urology for the General Surgeon. Surgical Clinics of North America, 96(3), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.010
- Perry, K., Mabrouk, A., & Chauvin, B. J. (2024, March 2). Pelvic ring injuries. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544330/
- Song, B., Wang, Q., Feng, W., Zhu, D., & Zhang, X. (2024). Comparison of pediatric pelvic fractures and associated injuries caused by different types of road traffic accidents. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2024.01.005
- Perumal, R., S, D. C. R., P, S. S., Jayaramaraju, D., Sen, R. K., & Trikha, V. (2021). Management of pelvic injuries in hemodynamically unstable polytrauma patients – Challenges and current updates. Journal of Clinical Orthopedics and Trauma, 12(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.09.035
- Osterhoff, G., Scheyerer, M. J., Fritz, Y., Bouaicha, S., Wanner, G. A., Simmen, H., & Werner, C. M. (2013). Comparing the predictive value of the pelvic ring injury classification systems by Tile and by Young and Burgess. Injury, 45(4), 742–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.12.003
- Wang, S., Fu, C., Bajani, F., Bokhari, M., Mis, J., Poulakidas, S., & Bokhari, F. (2021). Accuracy of the WSES classification system for pelvic ring disruptions: an international validation study. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00399-4
- Coccolini, F., Stahel, P. F., Montori, G., Biffl, W., Horer, T. M., Catena, F., Kluger, Y., Moore, E. E., Peitzman, A. B., Ivatury, R., Coimbra, R., Fraga, G. P., Pereira, B., Rizoli, S., Kirkpatrick, A., Leppaniemi, A., Manfredi, R., Magnone, S., Chiara, O., . . . Ansaloni, L. (2017). Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6
- James, D., & Pennardt, A. M. (2023, May 31). Trauma care principles. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547757/
- Chatrath, V., Khetarpal, R., & Ahuja, J. (2015). Fluid management in patients with trauma: Restrictive versus liberal approach. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 31(3), 308. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.161664
- Wallace, H. A., & Regunath, H. (2023, June 26). Fluid resuscitation. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534791/
- Khaliq, F., & Rodham, P. (2024, January 1). EMS Pelvic binders. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK598968/
- Minici, R., Mercurio, M., Guzzardi, G., Venturini, M., Fontana, F., Brunese, L., Guerriero, P., Serra, R., Piacentino, F., Spinetta, M., Zappia, L., Costa, D., Coppola, A., Galasso, O., & Laganà, D. (2023). Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Bleeding Related to Pelvic Trauma: Comparison of Technical and Clinical Results between Hemodynamically Stable and Unstable Patients. Tomography, 9(5), 1660–1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9050133
- Chou, C., Wu, Y., Fu, C., Liao, C., Wang, S., Bajani, F., & Hsieh, C. (2019). Hemostasis as soon as possible? The role of the time to angioembolization in the management of pelvic fracture. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0248-z
- McDonogh, J. M., Lewis, D. P., Tarrant, S. M., & Balogh, Z. J. (2022). Preperitoneal packing versus angioembolization for the initial management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 92(5), 931–939. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000003528
- Haruta, K., Endo, A., Shiraishi, A., & Otomo, Y. (2023). Usefulness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta compared to aortic cross‐clamping in severely injured trauma patients: Analysis from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Acute Medicine & Surgery, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.830
- Devaney, G. L., Bulman, J., King, K. L., & Balogh, Z. J. (2020). Time to definitive fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 89(4), 730–735. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002860
- Jäckle, K., Meier, M., Seitz, M., Höller, S., Spering, C., Acharya, M. R., & Lehmann, W. (2021). A retrospective study about functional outcome and quality of life after surgical fixation of insufficiency pelvic ring injuries. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04925-y
- Ramar, C. N., Vadakekut, E. S., & Grimes, W. R. (2024, August 11). Perineal lacerations. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559068/
- Van Breugel, J. M. M., Niemeyer, M. J. S., Houwert, R. M., Groenwold, R. H. H., Leenen, L. P. H., & Van Wessem, K. J. P. (2020). Global changes in mortality rates in polytrauma patients admitted to the ICU—a systematic review. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00330-3
- Emigh, B., Inaba, K., & Schellenberg, M. (2020). Contemporary diagnosis and management of traumatic rectal injuries. Surgery in Practice and Science, 4, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2020.100024
Disclaimer:
Use of Course Content. The courses provided by NCC are based on industry knowledge and input from professional nurses, experts, practitioners, and other individuals and institutions. The information presented in this course is intended solely for the use of healthcare professionals taking this course, for credit, from NCC. The information is designed to assist healthcare professionals, including nurses, in addressing issues associated with healthcare. The information provided in this course is general in nature and is not designed to address any specific situation. This publication in no way absolves facilities of their responsibility for the appropriate orientation of healthcare professionals. Hospitals or other organizations using this publication as a part of their own orientation processes should review the contents of this publication to ensure accuracy and compliance before using this publication. Knowledge, procedures or insight gained from the Student in the course of taking classes provided by NCC may be used at the Student’s discretion during their course of work or otherwise in a professional capacity. The Student understands and agrees that NCC shall not be held liable for any acts, errors, advice or omissions provided by the Student based on knowledge or advice acquired by NCC. The Student is solely responsible for his/her own actions, even if information and/or education was acquired from a NCC course pertaining to that action or actions. By clicking “complete” you are agreeing to these terms of use.
➁ Complete Survey
Give us your thoughts and feedback
➂ Click Complete
To receive your certificate